Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,579 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 141,460 of 142,579    |
|    John Harshman to MarkE    |
|    Re: Mapping the Origins Debate (2/2)    |
|    08 Sep 25 12:45:53    |
      [continued from previous message]              > do take science seriously.       >       > All of which takes us back to my original proposal: if my "1000 years"       > scenario eventuates, then rationally that adds impetus to consider       > supernatural explanations, even with the challenges mentioned. You may       > still declare your own unwillingness to consider the supernatural, even       > with the the most compelling "1000 years" scenario imaginable, and may       > justify that by claiming that such explanations are not knowable. I       > would respond that, at some point, a refusal to at least explore would       > betray an a priori commitment to materialism in the face of scientific       > evidence. And you may disagree, and there we would reach a stalemate.              Once more I ask how we would consider supernatural explanations. This is       the heart of your problem.              > Okay, we know where we stand. The best we can do then is stick to       > discussing science and make our own choices as to where that may lead.       >       > As for the "1000 years" of OOL, thankfully there's no need to wait, it's       > already here, the examples below being just a small sample...              I have no idea what you think "the examples below" are supposed to mean.              >>>>> -------       >>>>>       >>>>> * For example:       >>>>>       >>>>> 1. The thread here "New" "ideas" on origin of life: "The study       >>>>> finds life’s origin faces severe mathematical challenges".       >>>>>       >>>>> 2. Deeper OOL paradoxes only partially acknowledged, e.g. https://       >>>>> link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11084-014-9379-0       >>>>>       >>>>> 3. Or this (https://groups.google.com/g/talk.origins/c/HMw_ZoXIIOc/       >>>>> m/ nb1u4MD6AAAJ):       >>>>>       >>>>> This talk is from 2015, though David Deamer's book "Assembling       >>>>> Life" that is based on this was published in 2019. Note Bruce       >>>>> Damer's call for a new approach to OoL, and note the uncanny       >>>>> alignment with Tour, Bains, Long Story Short, etc:       >>>>>       >>>>> 4:29 “[OoL research has] been mainly focused on individual solution       >>>>> chemistry experiments where they want to show polymerization over       >>>>> here, or they want to show metabolism over here, and Dave and I       >>>>> believe that it's time for the field to go from incremental       >>>>> progress to substantial progress. So, these are the four points       >>>>> we've come up with to make substantial progress in the origin of       >>>>> life, and the first one is to employ something called system       >>>>> chemistry, having sufficient complexity so instead of one       >>>>> experiment say about proteins, now you have an experiment about the       >>>>> encapsulation of proteins for example, and informational molecules       >>>>> built from nucleotides in an environment that would say be like an       >>>>> analog of the early Earth, build a complex experiment. Something       >>>>> we're calling sufficient complexity, and all of these experiments       >>>>> have to move the reactions away from equilibrium. And what do we       >>>>> mean by that? Well, in in your high school chemistry experiments,       >>>>> something starts foaming something changes color and then the       >>>>> experiment winds down and stops. Well, life didn't get started that       >>>>> way. Life got started by a continuous run-up of complexity and       >>>>> building upon in a sense nature as a ratchet. So we have to figure       >>>>> out how to build experiments that move will move away from       >>>>> equilibrium…”       >>>>>       >>>>> 6:31 “You can't sit in a laboratory just using glassware. You have       >>>>> to go to the field. You have to go to hot springs, you have to go       >>>>> to […] Iceland and come check and sit down and see what the natural       >>>>> environment is like, rather than being in the ethereal world of       >>>>> pure reactants and things like that…”       >>>>>       >>>>>       >>>>       >>>       >>       >              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca