Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,579 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 141,505 of 142,579    |
|    RonO to Martin Harran    |
|    Re: Inheriting genes    |
|    11 Sep 25 20:27:16    |
      From: rokimoto557@gmail.com              On 9/11/2025 4:09 PM, Martin Harran wrote:       > I understand that we get half our DNA from each of our parents. How       > does that work backwards? I am into family research and have       > identified all 8 of my great-grandparents; did each of them       > contribute exactly 1/8 of my DNA or is that an approximation?       >       > In my case, I have 8 distinct great-grandparents What happen if there       > is some cross-breeding? Let's say that two of my grandparents were       > cousins so I only have seven different great-grandparents, Would that       > mean one of the 7 would have contributed 1/4 of my genes and the other       > six contributing 1/8 ?       >              I was involved in genomic selection. How it works is you figure out the       genomic relationship between all individuals back to around 3 or more       generations. You use the genetic variation segregating in the       population to determine how much of their genomes they have in common.       Since the lines had been closed for decades all the animals are related       to each other in some way so you get a genomic relationship with animals       not derived from the same families just 3 generations back. It is a       better and more accurate means of determining how related each       individual is instead of relying on pedigree that relies on probalistic       outcomes of vagaries of segregation. On average you would inherit about       25% of the genetics of one grandparent from one of your parents, but       because of random segregation from that parent one of the parent's       parents can get short changed and you inherit more than 25% from one and       less than 25% from the other.              In the case of cousin matings the progeny can end up looking like they       inherited more than 50% of one of their parents genetics. This is       because some of the same genetics are coming from both cousins involved       in the mating. The progeny end up with an average of 6.25%       homozygousity from their parent's shared ancestor for first cousin       matings. Since the cousins share 25% of their genetics their progeny       only inherit on average 12.5% from one parent, but some of the 25% that       is not transmitted from one parent can be transmitted from the other       parent. This makes the progeny of cousin matings look like they       inherited more than 50% of their genetics from one parent because both       cousins have genetics in common.              That is what you are going to be seeing in your backtrack analysis if       you could obtain DNA from those individuals. For your scenario of       cousin matings among one set of grandparents you still have 8 great       grandparents, but two of the great grandparents are sibs so you would       have 14 in stead of 16 great great grandparents. One of your parents       would be inbred. By the time the genetics segregated down to you it       would look like the inbred grand parent mating contributed more in your       genome than 25% each. You would have inherited some of the inbred       genetics from both of them making it look like your inbred parent had       inherited more than 50% of their genome from their cousin parents, and       passed half of that more than 50% down to you.              Ron Okimoto              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca