Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,579 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 141,514 of 142,579    |
|    RonO to RonO    |
|    Re: Gish Gallop Icons of creationist den    |
|    17 Sep 25 08:05:12    |
      From: rokimoto557@gmail.com              On 9/15/2025 10:38 AM, RonO wrote:       > On 7/19/2025 12:46 PM, RonO wrote:       >> I Googled the topics and added Duane Gish. It just demonstrates that       >> Wells' Icons were all well used creationist denial Icons.       >>       >> Wells' icons       >> 1 Miller–Urey experiment       >> 2 Darwin's tree of life       >> 3 Homology in vertebrate limbs       >> 4 Haeckel's embryos       >> 5 Archaeopteryx       >> 6 Peppered moth       >> 7 Darwin's finches       >> 8 Four-winged fruit flies       >> 9 Fossil horses       >> 10 Hominid evolution       >>       >> I tried homology first because Gish's denial was multi level and       >> included, claims of a drosophila experiment to deny vertebrate       >> homology. Google does note this argument, but does not note that       >> Gish's evidence was for suspected genes associated with drosophila       >> eyes and not for vertebrate limbs depicted in his homology slide. The       >> quote that he put up came from someone talking about a drosophila       >> experiment that occurred years before any actual genes had been       >> identified as being responsible for drosophila eyes. It would have       >> been a shift within species and did not have much to do with       >> homologous structures. There is no reason why the genes responsible       >> for the development of homologous structures cannot be swapped out or       >> changed over time. Any changes just have to work within what is       >> already working.       >>       >> QUOTE from below:       >> "Unproven" Genetic Basis: Gish also questioned the genetic basis of       >> homology, suggesting that similar genes for reptile legs and bird       >> wings should be present if they evolved from an ancestral leg, but       >> that evidence presented by evolutionists doesn't consistently support       >> this.       >> END QUOTE:       >>       >> Homology in vertebrate limbs and Duane Gish       >>       >> • Definition: Homology refers to the similarity in anatomical       >> structures, physiology, or development of different species due to       >> descent from a common evolutionary ancestor.       >> • Vertebrate Forelimbs as an Example: The classic example of       >> homology is the forelimbs of vertebrates, such as the human arm, bird       >> wing, and whale flipper. Despite their different functions (grasping,       >> flying, swimming), they are all composed of similar bones – the       >> humerus, radius, and ulna – arranged in a comparable pattern. This       >> underlying similarity, despite functional divergence, is explained by       >> the idea that these structures were inherited from a common ancestor       >> who had a similar limb structure, which was then modified over time       >> through evolution to suit different purposes.       >> • Evidence for Evolution: Homologous structures like the vertebrate       >> forelimb provide strong evidence for the theory of evolution and       >> common ancestry. They suggest that diverse species have evolved from a       >> common ancestor, adapting the inherited structures to their specific       >> environments and functions.       >> • The Pentadactyl Limb: The presence of a pentadactyl limb (five-       >> fingered limb) in various vertebrates, including humans, bats, and       >> whales, further strengthens the argument for common descent. Even       >> though their limbs serve different purposes, the shared basic       >> structure points towards a common ancestor with a similar limb design.       >> Duane Gish's arguments and criticism       >> • Duane Gish was a prominent creationist who engaged in debates       >> against the theory of evolution.       >> • Gish's Arguments Against Homology:       >> o Lack of direct evidence: Gish and other creationists argued that       >> homology does not prove evolution, as nobody has witnessed the gradual       >> changes in millions of generations from a common ancestor to a bird or       >> a human.       >> o Alternative Explanation: They suggested that similarities could       >> be explained by a "common design" by a creator, where similar       >> structures are used to solve similar functional problems.       >> o "Unproven" Genetic Basis: Gish also questioned the genetic basis       >> of homology, suggesting that similar genes for reptile legs and bird       >> wings should be present if they evolved from an ancestral leg, but       >> that evidence presented by evolutionists doesn't consistently support       >> this.       >> o "Gish Gallop": Gish was known for using a debating tactic called       >> the "Gish Gallop," where he would present a large number of arguments,       >> some accurate and some inaccurate or misleading, in a short time       >> frame, making it difficult for his opponents to address them all       >> comprehensively.       >>       >>       >> 1 Miller–Urey experiment       >> Google       >> Duane Gish       >> Duane Gish (1921-2013) was an American biochemist and a prominent       >> advocate of young Earth creationism. He served as a Vice President of       >> the Institute for Creation Research (ICR) and was known for his       >> numerous publications and debates arguing against evolutionary theory.       >> Gish's arguments against the Miller-Urey experiment       >> Gish and other creationists used the perceived shortcomings of the              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca