Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,579 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 141,670 of 142,579    |
|    Ernest Major to John Harshman    |
|    Re: Dinos with hooves (2/2)    |
|    28 Oct 25 22:59:44    |
      [continued from previous message]              >> not hooved; and pantolestids are not hooved.) The consensus date for       >> Ferae is 65 million years ago. Wikipedia gives a date for 73-85       >> million years for Scrotifera, but the relevant nodes, depending on       >> topology, are Zooamata or Ferungulata, which are younger.       >>       >> As support for hooves as a convergent trait, not all mesonychians       >> (which are stem artiodactyls) possessed hooves. However there is       >> dispute whether the hoofless mesonychians (arctocyonids) are stem-       >> artiodactyls.       >       > It's also the case that not all (or any??) stem-perissodactyls are       > hooved, and even some crown-perissodactyls aren't (chalicotheres). I'd       > say that convergence in hoofiness is considerably more parsimonious       > given the data, even forgetting about Dollo's Law.       >              I believe that notoungulates and litopterns are hoofed       stem-perissodactyls. If chalicotheres are primitively clawed, this       requires convergence in Hippomorpha, Ceratomorpha,       Notoungulata/Litopterna, and possibly other groups.              --       alias Ernest Major              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca