1cc27940   
   From: dalton@nfld.com   
      
   On Nov 3, 2025, JTEM wrote   
   (in article <10eaqo3$3243a$2@dont-email.me>):   
      
   > David Dalton wrote:   
   >   
   > > In my latest mystic attempt, described on the thread   
   > > “many judges” on alt.religion.druid, I am now divining   
   > > that there are 822 aliens here, of the usual four species,   
   > > that will merge with some humans to form four of the   
   > > species in a newly evolved 63 species human species group.   
   > >   
   > > I am posting to this group in case at least one of   
   > > the aliens might be monitoring this group and   
   > > would recognize if I finally have the number 822 correct.   
   > > Apologies for the off-topic delusional posting if I am   
   > > incorrect yet again in this series of Sisyphean attempts.   
   >   
   > Every time you post about this stuff -- which I think is   
   > batshit crazy but, heck, I've been wrong before. I mean,   
   > it'll be four years come this February but, but I was   
   > wrong, or misinformed -- but every time you post this stuff   
   > I think of Michael Moore.   
   >   
   > At one time, before he dared criticize the Gwobull Warbling   
   > scriptures, he was the darling of the left and Public Enemy   
   > #1 amongst the Reich wing. And in one of his books he was   
   > blasting our government's priorities, threw out some massive   
   > figure for military spending, using it to illustrate the   
   > waste. Well. The ReichTards ATTACKED Michael Moore because   
   > that figure he used, what be said the military budget WOULD   
   > BE was considerably less than Dubya Bush ended up spending.   
   > And the Reich insisted this "Proved" how bad Michael Moore   
   > was.   
   >   
   > Which was retarded.   
   >   
   > Because Michael Moore's point wasn't a specific dollar figure,   
   > it was that we were spending too much. And the fact that we   
   > had actually spent a great deal more than was originally   
   > projected FURTHERED HIS POINT.   
   >   
   > Alright, why do you remind me of him?   
   >   
   > Because, think of this:   
   >   
   > If it was absolutely positively beyond the shadow of a doubt   
   > PROVEN to the satisfaction of everyone that there are 411   
   > alien species in our solar system -- AND ONLY 411 SPECIES --   
   > would you really be disappointed?   
   >   
   > Are you honestly married to a specific number?   
   >   
   > I doubt it, so why bother with specific numbers at all?   
   >   
   > If there was 100 alien species, or 57, I couldn't imagine   
   > anyone not calling that a "Win" for you...   
   >   
   > So by being specific with such a large number you not only   
   > come across as batty but, twats are going to attack you no   
   > matter what.... EVEN IF IT'S PROVEN THAT THERE ARE ALIENS   
   > IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM!   
   >   
   > "Yeah, but there's only 50 and he said 822, so he's stupid   
   > and a liar or both plus something else."   
   >   
   > Less is more, dude.   
      
   I said there are 822 aliens of 4 species, not 822 species   
   or 411 species.   
      
   But my latest attempt failed, and I plan to try again between   
   full Beaver Supermoon/Guy Fawkes Day on Nov. 5   
   and the exact halfway point between fall equinox and   
   winter solstice on November 6 (which I refer to as   
   astronomical Samhain). We are also due to have a   
   weather bomb rain and wind storm from Tuesday   
   afternoon for about 24 hours which will be worse than   
   the remnant of Hurricane Melissa was here.   
      
   --   
   https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page)   
   "But once there was a darkness, deep and endless night; You gave   
   me everything you had, oh you gave me light." (Sarah McLachlan)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)