Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,579 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 141,751 of 142,579    |
|    Martin Harran to All    |
|    Re: There is no legitimate scientific su    |
|    06 Nov 25 09:44:47    |
      [continued from previous message]              That review is still available on Google Groups; I'd really love you       to read it and tell me what in it you disagree with,              https://groups.google.com/g/talk.origins/c/z8Yq7lvkAfU/m/um8mt8MDAgAJ                     >I do have my personal answer       >to that question, but it is irrelevant to the question at hand.       >       >As far as I can gather, all the other explanations boil down to the       >brute fact of, "It has always existed." Mass or matter, energy, and       >even the space. The naturalist somehow is able to ignore the laws of       >thermodynamics and even logic in this event and is comfortable with the       >idea that the "stuff" has just been around for ever, that it has always       >existed. In effect, you are claiming that the universe has an uncaused       >reality in this scenario, effectively giving it God like powers.       >       >If you accept that fine. I simply cannot. It had to come from       >somewhere for me. Of course this gets into not only the how, but the       >"why" question. But not for the naturalist. They don't ask why, and       >evidently are not bothered by the how. That shocks me to be honest.       >The motivation for doing so is interesting, but that's another       >discussion, as is why so many are uninterested in even asking the       >question.       >       >Starting at the beginning like this has led me to an increased interest       >in origins, yet you would suggest I'm just a not so clever person       >parroting some cool sounding soundbite I heard somewhere.              No, I'm not making any judgement at all about how clever you are; on       the contrary, I highly respect anyone who has prepared to question and       challenge rather than just accepting what they are told. I do however       think you're coming to conclusions on very limited understanding and       need to broaden your thinking, possibly by broadening your reading.              > In reality       >this is what I believe is the truth, and if discussion on things like       >this topic on origins remain reasonable, I'm willing to expose myself       >further.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca