From: wolverine01@charter.net   
      
   On 11/13/2025 1:11 PM, Vincent Maycock wrote:   
   > On Thu, 13 Nov 2025 12:08:54 -0600, sticks    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 11/13/2025 7:52 AM, Martin Harran wrote:   
   >>> On Tue, 11 Nov 2025 17:38:56 -0600, sticks    
   >>> wrote:   
   >    
   >>>> But, that appears to be changing, and   
   >>>> rather quickly it seems.  But, I suppose that's just a personal opinion.   
   >>>>    It is always going to be a problem for creationists in our "modern"   
   >>>> culture trying to convince anyone that there is a supernatural anything.   
   >>>>    It's just the world we live in.   
   >>>   
   >>> You won't convince anyone by trying to attack science that is well   
   >>> established and based on evidence. I don't even know why you would   
   >>> want to do that;   
   >>   
   >> I don't do that.  You say I do because you have different views than I   
   >> do.  Are you literally suggesting everyone should simply accept what is   
   >> consensus and stop further inquiry?  Good thing actual scientists don't   
   >> do that!   
   >   
   > So are scientists irrationally in support of  Darwin, per your sig, or   
   > are they rationally seeking out truth in science?  Both can't be   
   > right, can they?   
      
      
   You're asking me to define their motivation.  Each individual has to   
   make his own judgment as to whether or not Darwin's theory works and if   
   they wish to support it.  I can think of several reasons off the top of   
   my head, so it would be pointless to define them as a group, other than   
   supporting Darwin.  They just do.   
      
      
   --   
   Science doesn't support Darwin.  Scientists do.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)