Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,579 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 141,838 of 142,579    |
|    RonO to John Harshman    |
|    Re: There is no legitimate scientific su    |
|    16 Nov 25 19:48:14    |
      [continued from previous message]              and undiluted each generation even if they were recessive and covered by       the dominant trait for one or more generations. Darwin understood that       blending inheritance would dilute his selected trait instead of       transmitting it in full form.              Ron Okimoto>       >> "Mistake was the wrong word, "aberration" would have been better.       >> Saint John Henry Newman has been mentioned else-thread. Writing about       >> the absence of conflict between ecclesiastical authority and science,       >> he describes this as 'proved by the constantly cited case of Galileo.       >> Here "exceptio probat regulam: "[the exception proves the rule] for it       >> is the one stock argument.'       >>       >> [The Apologia of Saint John Henry Newman -       >> https://thefriar.org/2025/08/04/the-apologia-saint-john-henry-       >> newman-1865/]       >>> Studying God's creation in       >>> order to understand how it works is much smarter that insisting you       >>> already know all you need.       >>       >> [1] I only mean as far as science goes; there are many other things       >> outside of science for which the church deserves severe criticism.       >>       >              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca