Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,602 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 141,854 of 142,602    |
|    Martin Harran to All    |
|    Re: There is no legitimate scientific su    |
|    19 Nov 25 18:00:59    |
      [continued from previous message]              >> understand Catholic theology better than the Church's own theologians       >> and you understand history better than some of the most highly       >> regarded historians and as far as you are concerned, nothing is going       >> to change your damned mind.       >>       >You should just stop lying about the issue and accept reality.       >Christianity has been wrong about a lot of things about nature. There       >are still flat earth creationists and some of them are Catholics, there       >are still geocentric creationists and some of them are Catholics. I       >don't know if anyone still believes in the Biblical firmament, but       >Kepler was likely the last one messing with the issue when he came up       >with eliptical orbits and gave up on his notion of crystal spheres.       >There are still young earth creationists and some of them are Catholics.       > Behe is a Catholic ID perp. Most of the other ID perps are not       >Catholic, but Christians of one stripe or another. Even Denton       >eventually admitted to being raised Anglican, and that he was probably       >still a Christian. He published his deistic views in his second book at       >the turn of the Century, and none of the other ID perps supported his       >beliefs. Denton quit the ID scam and missed the other ID perps starting       >the bait and switch. Denton did come back to support the bait and       >switch effort, and published 5 or 6 other deistic books that no one ever       >hears about because they are not supported by the other ID perps.       >Denton has pretty much given up on all the creationist denial. He just       >claims that his designer set things up with the Big Bang and it all       >unfolded into what we have today. Geocentrism is so far back in history       >for something that creationism should have given up on that your       >stupidity about the issue is just unwarranted. The ID perps don't care.       > All creationists are welcomed under their Big Tent of denial.       >       >Biblical creationists have been wrong about a lot of things for a very       >long time. You should just accept that and move on. My guess is that       >the majority of modern Christians are not any type of Biblical       >literalists, and gave up on the Bible telling them anything about the       >creation long ago. The Bible was simply written by authors that did not       >understand what they were describing. Even if we wrote the Bible today       >the Top Six should tell anyone that we can still get things wrong, and       >just have to wait for a better understanding of reality.       >       >Ron Okimoto       >       >> I've only stuck with this stupid argument because I find it incredibly       >> sad that someone so highly regarded around here for his scientific       >> skills should make himself look so foolish by bringing himself down to       >> the level of the ID'ers he fights so hard against, but the Serenity       >> Prayer kicks in and I accept what I cannot change.       >>              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca