Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,579 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 141,915 of 142,579    |
|    RonO to MarkE    |
|    Re: ID's assertion and definition of a "    |
|    06 Dec 25 11:45:15    |
      [continued from previous message]              these new structures did not evolve by Darwinian mechanisms because he       notes that Darwinian mechanisms were obviously working to select for the       broken genes.              >       > The nature and measurement of information seems slippery. As you       > mention, is it Kolmogorov complexity or Darwkin's "incomplete record of       > the historical environment", or something else?              No matter how the ID perps have tried to measure information, nothing       has panned out for them. At one time Dembski admitted that natural       selection could be the designer. None of them have been able to       demonstrate that any of their examples of information could not have       evolved by descent with modification. They aren't even dealing with the       information that they need to deal with when they lie about the genetic       code. The information required for life is not in the genetic code, but       in the 3 dimensional structures created by the string of amino acids       produced using that code, and as the ID perps themselves admit life has       only had to explore a very small portion of possible protein space in       order to evolve the diversity that it has. It is just a fact that only       a very small bit of protein space has had to be tested in order to do       everything that needs to be done. This seems to be due to the fact that       the vast majority of protein genes have evolved from existing protein       genes, and that sequence has only had to be changed a little in order to       create the new function. Your adaptive immune system would not work by       mutation and selection if this was not the case.              Ron Okimoto              >       > ID posits a lawlike conservation of information, which I find       > intuitively appealing, but Dembski's efforts to formally define this       > have yet to land it seems.       >       >       >       >       >              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca