From: rokimoto557@gmail.com   
      
   On 12/15/2025 6:27 AM, MarkE wrote:   
   > Q5. Examine one of the genuinely hard cases—for example: Origin of hair-   
   > cell mechanotransduction.   
   >   
   > A. https://chatgpt.com/s/t_693ffeaf88808191ae6e17e4d5334efa   
   >   
   > Hair-cell mechanotransduction (MET) is “hard” for exactly the reason you   
   > are targeting: it is a multi-component nanomachine (tip links, gating   
   > springs, a mechanically gated cation channel, lipid/actin couplings,   
   > adaptation motors) that must work at microsecond–millisecond timescales.   
   > We can, however, say substantially more today than we could 15–20 years   
   > ago, because the core molecular players are now identified and   
   > reconstituted to varying degrees...   
   >   
      
   and these known components all evolved from preexisting components.   
      
   Why pick the ear?  Why not the eye?  You do know that mammalian inner   
   ear likely evolved before the crop plants existed that were supposed to   
   have been created before land animals?  Identifying the existence of   
   this designer would just mean that the Bible is wrong about creation.   
   The entire basis for your continued denial of reality would be found to   
   be based on incorrect information.  Why do you think that the other TO   
   IDiotic creationists quit the ID scam when confronted by the reality of   
   the Top Six?   
      
   Ron Okimoto   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)