Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,579 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 141,980 of 142,579    |
|    RonO to MarkE    |
|    Re: AI as an alternative to TO (1/3)    |
|    15 Dec 25 18:14:42    |
      From: rokimoto557@gmail.com              On 12/15/2025 3:41 PM, MarkE wrote:       > On 16/12/2025 3:11 am, RonO wrote:       >> On 12/15/2025 6:09 AM, MarkE wrote:       >>> An interesting conversation with ChatGPT 5.2:       >>>       >>> Q1. With biological evolution of say mammals there are multiple       >>> traits (there must be thousands) that are simultaneously being       >>> optimised or conserved. How does does this work with purifying,       >>> selection, population genetics, fixation etc?       >>>       >>> https://chatgpt.com/s/t_693ffa4b47c881919ebcff6447a49748       >>>       >>> A. This question goes to the core of modern evolutionary genetics and       >>> is exactly where naïve “single-trait” intuitions break down. The       >>> short answer is: evolution does not optimise traits one-by-one.       >>> Instead, selection operates on whole organisms whose genomes encode       >>> thousands of partially coupled traits, and population genetics       >>> provides the machinery for how this can work without contradiction.       >>>       >>> I will structure the answer from first principles, then address the       >>> apparent paradox of “thousands of traits at once”.       >>>       >>> 1. What selection actually “sees”       >>>       >>> Natural selection does not see traits independently. It acts on:       >>>       >>> Whole organisms       >>>       >>> Whose phenotypes are emergent outcomes of       >>>       >>> Genotypes interacting with environments       >>>       >>> Formally, selection acts on differences in reproductive success       >>> (fitness). Traits matter only insofar as they contribute (positively,       >>> negatively, or neutrally) to that success.       >>>       >>> So the unit of selection is not:       >>>       >>> “eye sharpness”, “bone density”, “enzyme X efficiency”       >>>       >>> but rather:       >>>       >>> organism A leaves more descendants than organism B in environment E.       >>>       >>> 2. Genomes are high-dimensional systems, not collections of knobs       >>>       >>> A mammalian genome has:       >>>       >>> ~20,000 protein-coding genes       >>>       >>> Millions of regulatory elements       >>>       >>> Extensive pleiotropy (one gene affects many traits)       >>>       >>> Extensive epistasis (gene effects depend on other genes)       >>>       >>> This creates a high-dimensional fitness landscape, where:       >>>       >>> Each genotype is a point in ~millions of dimensions       >>>       >>> Fitness is a scalar value assigned to that point       >>>       >>> Selection therefore performs gradient ascent in a very high-       >>> dimensional space, not independent optimisation of each axis.       >>>       >>> Key implication:       >>>       >>> Most dimensions are nearly flat most of the time.       >>>       >>> 3. Purifying selection dominates most of the genome       >>>       >>> Empirically, in mammals:       >>>       >>> The majority of mutations are neutral or nearly neutral       >>>       >>> A substantial fraction are deleterious       >>>       >>> Only a tiny fraction are beneficial at any time       >>>       >>> This is why purifying (negative) selection is the dominant mode:       >>>       >>> Mutations that disrupt conserved functions are removed       >>>       >>> Existing functional structures are maintained, not continuously       >>> “improved”       >>>       >>> Mathematically:       >>>       >>> For a deleterious mutation with selection coefficient       >>> 𝑠       >>> <       >>> 0       >>> s<0,       >>>       >>> Its fixation probability is approximately:       >>>       >>> 𝑃       >>> ≈       >>> 1       >>> −       >>> 𝑒       >>> 2       >>> 𝑠       >>> 1       >>> −       >>> 𝑒       >>> −       >>> 4       >>> 𝑁       >>> 𝑒       >>> 𝑠       >>> P≈       >>> 1−e       >>> −4N       >>> e       >>>        >>>       >>> s       >>> 1−e       >>> 2s       >>>        >>>       >>>       >>> which is vanishingly small for moderate       >>> ∣       >>> 𝑠       >>> ∣       >>> ∣s∣ in large populations.       >>>       >>> Thus, thousands of traits are “simultaneously conserved” simply       because:       >>>       >>> Any mutation that degrades them is efficiently removed.       >>>       >>> No active optimisation is required.       >>>       >>> 4. Nearly-neutral theory resolves the “too many traits” intuition       >>>       >>> Motoo Kimura’s nearly neutral theory is critical here.       >>>       >>> Key idea:       >>>       >>> Many mutations have effects       >>> ∣       >>> 𝑠       >>> ∣       >>> ≈       >>> 1       >>> 𝑁       >>> 𝑒       >>> ∣s∣≈       >>> N       >>> e       >>>        >>>       >>> 1       >>>        >>>       >>>       >>> Their fate is governed largely by genetic drift, not selection       >>>       >>> Consequences:       >>>       >>> Small-effect mutations can drift through populations       >>>       >>> Large-effect deleterious mutations are purged       >>>       >>> Large-effect beneficial mutations are rare       >>>       >>> This means:       >>>       >>> Traits can wander within tolerance bounds       >>>       >>> As long as performance stays within a viable envelope, selection is       >>> indifferent       >>>       >>> This dramatically reduces the “coordination problem”.       >>>       >>> 5. Fixation does not require global optimisation       >>>       >>> A common misunderstanding is thinking fixation requires a trait to be       >>> “globally optimal”.       >>>       >>> In reality:       >>>       >>> Fixation only requires local advantage or drift       >>>       >>> The population is almost never at a global optimum       >>>       >>> Most fixation events involve:       >>>       >>> Slight modifiers       >>>       >>> Compensatory changes       >>>       >>> Context-dependent advantages       >>>       >>> Important point:       >>>       >>> Fixation is path-dependent and historically contingent.       >>>       >>> Evolution “locks in” workable solutions, not best ones.       >>>              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca