home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.origins      Evolution versus creationism (sometimes      142,579 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 141,980 of 142,579   
   RonO to MarkE   
   Re: AI as an alternative to TO (1/3)   
   15 Dec 25 18:14:42   
   
   From: rokimoto557@gmail.com   
      
   On 12/15/2025 3:41 PM, MarkE wrote:   
   > On 16/12/2025 3:11 am, RonO wrote:   
   >> On 12/15/2025 6:09 AM, MarkE wrote:   
   >>> An interesting conversation with ChatGPT 5.2:   
   >>>   
   >>> Q1. With biological evolution of say mammals there are multiple   
   >>> traits (there must be thousands) that are simultaneously being   
   >>> optimised or conserved. How does does this work with purifying,   
   >>> selection, population genetics, fixation etc?   
   >>>   
   >>> https://chatgpt.com/s/t_693ffa4b47c881919ebcff6447a49748   
   >>>   
   >>> A. This question goes to the core of modern evolutionary genetics and   
   >>> is exactly where naïve “single-trait” intuitions break down. The   
   >>> short answer is: evolution does not optimise traits one-by-one.   
   >>> Instead, selection operates on whole organisms whose genomes encode   
   >>> thousands of partially coupled traits, and population genetics   
   >>> provides the machinery for how this can work without contradiction.   
   >>>   
   >>> I will structure the answer from first principles, then address the   
   >>> apparent paradox of “thousands of traits at once”.   
   >>>   
   >>> 1. What selection actually “sees”   
   >>>   
   >>> Natural selection does not see traits independently. It acts on:   
   >>>   
   >>> Whole organisms   
   >>>   
   >>> Whose phenotypes are emergent outcomes of   
   >>>   
   >>> Genotypes interacting with environments   
   >>>   
   >>> Formally, selection acts on differences in reproductive success   
   >>> (fitness). Traits matter only insofar as they contribute (positively,   
   >>> negatively, or neutrally) to that success.   
   >>>   
   >>> So the unit of selection is not:   
   >>>   
   >>> “eye sharpness”, “bone density”, “enzyme X efficiency”   
   >>>   
   >>> but rather:   
   >>>   
   >>> organism A leaves more descendants than organism B in environment E.   
   >>>   
   >>> 2. Genomes are high-dimensional systems, not collections of knobs   
   >>>   
   >>> A mammalian genome has:   
   >>>   
   >>> ~20,000 protein-coding genes   
   >>>   
   >>> Millions of regulatory elements   
   >>>   
   >>> Extensive pleiotropy (one gene affects many traits)   
   >>>   
   >>> Extensive epistasis (gene effects depend on other genes)   
   >>>   
   >>> This creates a high-dimensional fitness landscape, where:   
   >>>   
   >>> Each genotype is a point in ~millions of dimensions   
   >>>   
   >>> Fitness is a scalar value assigned to that point   
   >>>   
   >>> Selection therefore performs gradient ascent in a very high-   
   >>> dimensional space, not independent optimisation of each axis.   
   >>>   
   >>> Key implication:   
   >>>   
   >>> Most dimensions are nearly flat most of the time.   
   >>>   
   >>> 3. Purifying selection dominates most of the genome   
   >>>   
   >>> Empirically, in mammals:   
   >>>   
   >>> The majority of mutations are neutral or nearly neutral   
   >>>   
   >>> A substantial fraction are deleterious   
   >>>   
   >>> Only a tiny fraction are beneficial at any time   
   >>>   
   >>> This is why purifying (negative) selection is the dominant mode:   
   >>>   
   >>> Mutations that disrupt conserved functions are removed   
   >>>   
   >>> Existing functional structures are maintained, not continuously   
   >>> “improved”   
   >>>   
   >>> Mathematically:   
   >>>   
   >>> For a deleterious mutation with selection coefficient   
   >>> 𝑠   
   >>> <   
   >>> 0   
   >>> s<0,   
   >>>   
   >>> Its fixation probability is approximately:   
   >>>   
   >>> 𝑃   
   >>> ≈   
   >>> 1   
   >>> −   
   >>> 𝑒   
   >>> 2   
   >>> 𝑠   
   >>> 1   
   >>> −   
   >>> 𝑒   
   >>> −   
   >>> 4   
   >>> 𝑁   
   >>> 𝑒   
   >>> 𝑠   
   >>> P≈   
   >>> 1−e   
   >>> −4N   
   >>> e   
   >>>      ​   
   >>>   
   >>> s   
   >>> 1−e   
   >>> 2s   
   >>>      ​   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> which is vanishingly small for moderate   
   >>> ∣   
   >>> 𝑠   
   >>> ∣   
   >>> ∣s∣ in large populations.   
   >>>   
   >>> Thus, thousands of traits are “simultaneously conserved” simply   
   because:   
   >>>   
   >>> Any mutation that degrades them is efficiently removed.   
   >>>   
   >>> No active optimisation is required.   
   >>>   
   >>> 4. Nearly-neutral theory resolves the “too many traits” intuition   
   >>>   
   >>> Motoo Kimura’s nearly neutral theory is critical here.   
   >>>   
   >>> Key idea:   
   >>>   
   >>> Many mutations have effects   
   >>> ∣   
   >>> 𝑠   
   >>> ∣   
   >>> ≈   
   >>> 1   
   >>> 𝑁   
   >>> 𝑒   
   >>> ∣s∣≈   
   >>> N   
   >>> e   
   >>>      ​   
   >>>   
   >>> 1   
   >>>      ​   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Their fate is governed largely by genetic drift, not selection   
   >>>   
   >>> Consequences:   
   >>>   
   >>> Small-effect mutations can drift through populations   
   >>>   
   >>> Large-effect deleterious mutations are purged   
   >>>   
   >>> Large-effect beneficial mutations are rare   
   >>>   
   >>> This means:   
   >>>   
   >>> Traits can wander within tolerance bounds   
   >>>   
   >>> As long as performance stays within a viable envelope, selection is   
   >>> indifferent   
   >>>   
   >>> This dramatically reduces the “coordination problem”.   
   >>>   
   >>> 5. Fixation does not require global optimisation   
   >>>   
   >>> A common misunderstanding is thinking fixation requires a trait to be   
   >>> “globally optimal”.   
   >>>   
   >>> In reality:   
   >>>   
   >>> Fixation only requires local advantage or drift   
   >>>   
   >>> The population is almost never at a global optimum   
   >>>   
   >>> Most fixation events involve:   
   >>>   
   >>> Slight modifiers   
   >>>   
   >>> Compensatory changes   
   >>>   
   >>> Context-dependent advantages   
   >>>   
   >>> Important point:   
   >>>   
   >>> Fixation is path-dependent and historically contingent.   
   >>>   
   >>> Evolution “locks in” workable solutions, not best ones.   
   >>>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca