Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,579 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 142,014 of 142,579    |
|    MarkE to JTEM    |
|    Re: Chimp to human evolution - Sandwalk     |
|    18 Dec 25 22:40:32    |
      From: me22over7@gmail.com              On 17/12/2025 4:45 am, JTEM wrote:       > On 12/15/25 7:53 PM, MarkE wrote:       >> Larry Moran offers this analysis:       >>       >> "...A small number of these neutral mutations will become fixed in the       >> population and it's these fixed mutations that produce most of the       >> changes in the genome of evolving populations. According to the       >> neutral theory of population genetics, the number of fixed neutral       >> mutations corresponds to the mutation rate. Thus, in every evolving       >> population there will be 100 new fixed mutations per generation. This       >> means that fixation of 22 million mutations would take 220,000       >> generations. The average generation time of humans and chimps is 27.5       >> years so this corresponds to about 6 million years. That's close to       >> the time that humans and chimps diverged according to the fossil       >> record. What this means is that evolutionary theory is able to explain       >> the differences in the human genome—it has explanatory power."       >> https://sandwalk.blogspot.com/2025/12/how-many-regulatory-sites-in-       >> human.html       >       > Humans evolved so much because we evolved under a Distributive Computing       > model. It wasn't time -- or not just time -- it's that "the problem" of       > our evolution was being worked on by numerous populations,       > simultaneously.       >       > You are obviously "Classically Trained," and I do mean "Trained."       >       > You think in terms of linear models. And this is not how nature works.       >       > Sorry.       >       > "Evolution" isn't only in one direction, time isn't the only factor.       >       > Necessity is a massive factor.       >       > Take a population well adapted to an environment and then change that       > environment. If and only if that population has the genetic capacity       > to adapt, it will leave descendants... it will evolve. DNA that       > previously lay on the on the fringes can "Take over," so to speak, in       > a single generation... no "Clock like" changes.              Whatever the case, there remains the question of where the large amount       of additional functionality came from.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca