From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   On 12/19/25 10:59 AM, RonO wrote:   
      
   > As you know Abiogenesis is one of the weakest of scientific endeavors   
      
   It's not scientific at all. It is religion. It is faith based.   
      
   There are alternatives!   
      
   Well. Panspermia, or some variation thereof.   
      
   > but it is still science which is more than you can say about a stupid   
   > religious bait and switch scam.   
      
   It's not science at all.   
      
   You can design & conduct "Scientific" experiments to "Prove" Noah's   
   flood but it's still religion, ESPECIALLY when no amount of failure   
   is capable of falsifying your Noah's-Flood-Is-Real "Hypothesis."   
      
   ZERO difference in the case of Abiogenesis.   
      
   The claim is that it's explored scientifically but, it's pure   
   religion.   
      
   >> SETI is too.   
   >   
   > Your stupid fixation on SETI should worry you.   
      
   Wow, what a characteristically emotional reaction to a stated   
   fact!   
      
   Clearly you have an open wound on the SETI religion...   
      
   You worship radio signals? Radio telescopes? People in lab coats?   
      
   WHAT oh WHAT are you so emotionally attached to?   
      
    > Who claims that SETI is good science?   
      
   You can stop throwing a hissy fit in reaction to my stating that   
   it's not science, if you want to pretend you don't view it as   
   science.   
      
   Just saying.   
      
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)