Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,579 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 142,038 of 142,579    |
|    RonO to JTEM    |
|    Re: Peer reviewed research lies about ID    |
|    21 Dec 25 16:33:01    |
      From: rokimoto557@gmail.com              On 12/21/2025 3:17 PM, JTEM wrote:       > On 12/19/25 10:59 AM, RonO wrote:       >       >> As you know Abiogenesis is one of the weakest of scientific endeavors       >       > It's not scientific at all. It is religion. It is faith based.       >       > There are alternatives!       >       > Well. Panspermia, or some variation thereof.       >       >> but it is still science which is more than you can say about a stupid       >> religious bait and switch scam.       >       > It's not science at all.       >       > You can design & conduct "Scientific" experiments to "Prove" Noah's       > flood but it's still religion, ESPECIALLY when no amount of failure       > is capable of falsifying your Noah's-Flood-Is-Real "Hypothesis."       >       > ZERO difference in the case of Abiogenesis.       >       > The claim is that it's explored scientifically but, it's pure       > religion.              What a nut job. Your problem is that you do not know what you are       talking about. You obviously do not understand what hypothesis testing is.              >       >>> SETI is too.       >>       >> Your stupid fixation on SETI should worry you.       >       > Wow, what a characteristically emotional reaction to a stated       > fact!       >       > Clearly you have an open wound on the SETI religion...       >       > You worship radio signals? Radio telescopes? People in lab coats?       >       > WHAT oh WHAT are you so emotionally attached to?              It is your fixation. Who else cares about SETI on TO? You are the one       that keeps putting it forward as some type of anti science stupidity.              >       > > Who claims that SETI is good science?       >       > You can stop throwing a hissy fit in reaction to my stating that       > it's not science, if you want to pretend you don't view it as       > science.       >       > Just saying.              You have the issue, and you never seem to understand why you are wrong       about it. What have you just snipped out and run from in this thread?              You need to start learning by experience.              Ron Okimoto              >       >       >              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca