From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   Farts in the tub, bites the bubbles, RonO wrote:   
      
   >> You can design & conduct "Scientific" experiments to "Prove" Noah's   
   >> flood but it's still religion, ESPECIALLY when no amount of failure   
   >> is capable of falsifying your Noah's-Flood-Is-Real "Hypothesis."   
   >>   
   >> ZERO difference in the case of Abiogenesis.   
   >>   
   >> The claim is that it's explored scientifically but, it's pure   
   >> religion.   
      
   > What a nut job.   
      
   So you're saying that Noah's flood & arc are science?   
      
   > Your problem is that you do not know what you are   
   > talking about.   
      
   So you ARE claiming that Noah's flood & arc are science!   
      
   > It is your fixation.   
      
   Your mental illness is causing you to avoid the issues here, again.   
      
   Doesn't matter if someone calls themselves a "Scientist" and   
   uses what they swear are scientific methods to investigate Noah's   
   flood, it's still religion. And in the case of abiogenesis and   
   SETI, it's religion where no number of FAILED results can falsify   
   their beliefs. Nope. They are always true regardless of how many   
   scientific examinations debunk them.   
      
   SETI insists that they've been failing for 41 years, and they're   
   still not wrong! Abiogenesis has more than 70 years of failed   
   results while swearing to be fact!   
      
   You have lots of other religious beliefs as well... the Darwin   
   myth, for example.   
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)