home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.origins      Evolution versus creationism (sometimes      142,579 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 142,046 of 142,579   
   RonO to JTEM   
   Re: Peer reviewed research lies about ID   
   22 Dec 25 10:42:49   
   
   From: rokimoto557@gmail.com   
      
   On 12/21/2025 10:37 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   >   
   > Farts in the tub, bites the bubbles, RonO wrote:   
   >   
   >>> You can design & conduct "Scientific" experiments to "Prove" Noah's   
   >>> flood but it's still religion, ESPECIALLY when no amount of failure   
   >>> is capable of falsifying your Noah's-Flood-Is-Real "Hypothesis."   
   >>>   
   >>> ZERO difference in the case of Abiogenesis.   
   >>>   
   >>> The claim is that it's explored scientifically but, it's pure   
   >>> religion.   
   >   
   >> What a nut job.   
   >   
   > So you're saying that Noah's flood & arc are science?   
      
   So you never understand what you should have read, and snip out what you   
   can't deal with.  Are you demonstrating an understanding of hypothesis   
   testing?  No.   
      
   >   
   >> Your problem is that you do not know what you are talking about.   
   >   
   > So you ARE claiming that Noah's flood & arc are science!   
      
   I claimed that you did not understand what hypothesis testing is.  Think   
   about it and try again.   
      
   >   
   >> It is your fixation.   
   >   
   > Your mental illness is causing you to avoid the issues here, again.   
   >   
   > Doesn't matter if someone calls themselves a "Scientist" and   
   > uses what they swear are scientific methods to investigate Noah's   
   > flood, it's still religion. And in the case of abiogenesis and   
   > SETI, it's religion where no number of FAILED results can falsify   
   > their beliefs. Nope. They are always true regardless of how many   
   > scientific examinations debunk them.   
   >   
   > SETI insists that they've been failing for 41 years, and they're   
   > still not wrong! Abiogenesis has more than 70 years of failed   
   > results while swearing to be fact!   
   >   
   > You have lots of other religious beliefs as well... the Darwin   
   > myth, for example.   
   >   
   >   
   There is that fixation on SETI again.  You know the part that you   
   snipped out and can't deal with.   
      
   Ron Okimoto   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca