Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,579 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 142,046 of 142,579    |
|    RonO to JTEM    |
|    Re: Peer reviewed research lies about ID    |
|    22 Dec 25 10:42:49    |
      From: rokimoto557@gmail.com              On 12/21/2025 10:37 PM, JTEM wrote:       >       > Farts in the tub, bites the bubbles, RonO wrote:       >       >>> You can design & conduct "Scientific" experiments to "Prove" Noah's       >>> flood but it's still religion, ESPECIALLY when no amount of failure       >>> is capable of falsifying your Noah's-Flood-Is-Real "Hypothesis."       >>>       >>> ZERO difference in the case of Abiogenesis.       >>>       >>> The claim is that it's explored scientifically but, it's pure       >>> religion.       >       >> What a nut job.       >       > So you're saying that Noah's flood & arc are science?              So you never understand what you should have read, and snip out what you       can't deal with. Are you demonstrating an understanding of hypothesis       testing? No.              >       >> Your problem is that you do not know what you are talking about.       >       > So you ARE claiming that Noah's flood & arc are science!              I claimed that you did not understand what hypothesis testing is. Think       about it and try again.              >       >> It is your fixation.       >       > Your mental illness is causing you to avoid the issues here, again.       >       > Doesn't matter if someone calls themselves a "Scientist" and       > uses what they swear are scientific methods to investigate Noah's       > flood, it's still religion. And in the case of abiogenesis and       > SETI, it's religion where no number of FAILED results can falsify       > their beliefs. Nope. They are always true regardless of how many       > scientific examinations debunk them.       >       > SETI insists that they've been failing for 41 years, and they're       > still not wrong! Abiogenesis has more than 70 years of failed       > results while swearing to be fact!       >       > You have lots of other religious beliefs as well... the Darwin       > myth, for example.       >       >       There is that fixation on SETI again. You know the part that you       snipped out and can't deal with.              Ron Okimoto              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca