From: me22over7@gmail.com   
      
   On 29/12/2025 1:01 am, jillery wrote:   
   > On Wed, 24 Dec 2025 21:07:17 -0600, RonO    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 12/24/2025 5:32 PM, sticks wrote:   
   >>> On 12/24/2025 12:31 PM, RonO wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>> Merry Christmas and best wishes for the new year.   
   >>>   
   >>> ---snip---   
   >>>   
   >>> Sad really that you couldn't have just stopped here with your followup,   
   >>> but instead had to once again inject this obsession of yours into even   
   >>> this.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> In 2026 TO will be 40.  Snipping out the relevant history doesn't change   
   >> reality.  It is just a fact that the Supreme court decision should have   
   >> been the end of the creationist denial stupidity, but it just caused the   
   >> name change of creationism to intelligent design, and that court   
   >> decision occurred just one year after TO started.  Creationists in   
   >> denial like yourself and MarkE have been beating a dead horse for nearly   
   >> as long as TO has existed.   
   >>   
   >> Ron Okimoto   
   >   
   >   
   > To give credit where it's due, it could reasonably be argued that   
   > Creationists are responsible for T.O.'s existence.   
   >   
      
   Thank you. I agree, it seems to me that TO is primarily a confrontation   
   of worldviews (materialist and supernaturalist), mediated through   
   interpretation of science. Secondarily, it is a debate/discussion of   
   various evolution and origin of life hypotheses.   
      
   It feels like creationists have always been a minority, even more so in   
   this its dying embers.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)