home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.origins      Evolution versus creationism (sometimes      142,579 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 142,155 of 142,579   
   jillery to MarkE   
   Re: You're gonna love this... (1/2)   
   07 Jan 26 07:16:06   
   
   From: 69jpil69@gmail.com   
      
   On Wed, 7 Jan 2026 01:13:42 +1100, MarkE  wrote:   
      
   >I've recently claimed here that the 80 megabytes of information in the    
   >functional portion of the human genome is wildly insufficient to specify    
   >the development of a human [1] into the system that is us [2]. I've    
   >suggested that the "missing" information must be located in the ovum's    
   >cytoplasm, organelles and membrane.   
   >   
   >I've directly asked a number of contributors here if they believe 80 MB    
   >is sufficient to specify a human. This has generally been met with    
   >silence. I can understand why, after an even cursory consideration of    
   >[1] and [2]. Moreover, the implications of this for evolutionary theory    
   >and biology are profound.   
      
      
      
   That silence is the sound of one hand clapping, as all wait for you to   
   say on what basis you think 80 MB is *insufficient* to specify a   
   human.   
      
      
   >Anyway, it seems that ID agrees with me. This may not help convince you,    
   >but I'm encouraged that others think this is an issue that needs attention.   
   >   
   >If you're unfamiliar, what you may find interesting is ID's proposed    
   >solution: an "immaterial genome", with reference to Neoplatonism.   
   >   
   >I'm not discounting that position, but do find it surprising! Would this    
   >be a new creationist category, something like Continuous Creation? Some    
   >may have less complimentary suggestions.   
   >   
   >Anyway, enjoy (Ron, you may need medical attention after reading these):   
   >   
   >https://scienceandculture.com/2025/05/the-immaterial-genome-ric   
   ard-sternbergs-labor-of-love/   
   >   
   >https://scienceandculture.com/2025/04/the-math-behind-the-immaterial-genome/    
   >   
   >   
   >______________   
   >   
   >   
   >[1] FROM ONE CELL TO A HUMAN BEING: AN OVERVIEW OF THE PROCESS AND ITS    
   >MYSTERIES   
   >   
   >*Fertilisation* begins when a sperm and ovum fuse to form a single cell:    
   >the *zygote*. In that moment, a new, genetically unique human organism    
   >exists. Yet nothing visible distinguishes this cell from countless    
   >others. What follows is one of the most extraordinary processes known in    
   >nature.   
   >   
   >---   
   >   
   >## 1. Exponential division without growth: cleavage   
   >   
   >Within hours, the zygote begins dividing: 1 cell becomes 2, then 4, 8,    
   >16, and so on. These early divisions, called *cleavage*, are remarkable    
   >because the total size of the embryo does not increase. Instead, the    
   >original cytoplasm is partitioned into ever-smaller cells.   
   >   
   >Key features:   
   >   
   >* Division is rapid and tightly synchronized.   
   >* Cells remain enclosed in the original outer membrane.   
   >* The embryo reaches ~100 cells in a few days.   
   >   
   >*What is striking:*   
   >All cells initially appear equivalent, yet they are already on    
   >trajectories that will lead to radically different fates.   
   >   
   >*What we do not fully understand:*   
   >How early asymmetries—subtle differences in molecular concentrations,    
   >mechanics, and timing—bias later cell fate decisions with such reliability.   
   >   
   >---   
   >   
   >## 2. Self-organisation and implantation: the blastocyst   
   >   
   >After several days, the embryo reorganises into a *blastocyst*—a hollow    
   >structure with:   
   >   
   >* an *inner cell mass* (which will become the body),   
   >* and an *outer layer* (which will help form the placenta).   
   >   
   >The blastocyst implants into the uterine wall, establishing a    
   >biochemical dialogue with the mother that allows pregnancy to continue.   
   >   
   >*What is striking:*   
   >This organisation emerges without a central controller. Cells “decide”    
   >their roles through local interactions, gene regulation, and physical    
   >constraints.   
   >   
   >*What we do not fully understand:*   
   >How global structure arises so robustly from local rules, and why    
   >implantation succeeds or fails so often despite apparently normal embryos.   
   >   
   >---   
   >   
   >## 3. The body plan appears: gastrulation   
   >   
   >Around the third week, the embryo undergoes *gastrulation*, often called    
   >*the most important event in your life*. A simple sheet of cells folds    
   >and rearranges to form three foundational layers:   
   >   
   >* *Ectoderm* ? nervous system, skin   
   >* *Mesoderm* ? muscle, bone, blood, heart   
   >* *Endoderm* ? gut, liver, lungs   
   >   
   > From this point onward, the basic body axes—head to tail, back to    
   >front, left to right—are established.   
   >   
   >*What is striking:*   
   >A consistent human body plan emerges from dramatic cellular movements    
   >that look, under a microscope, almost chaotic.   
   >   
   >*What we do not fully understand:*   
   >How genetic instructions, chemical gradients, and mechanical forces are    
   >integrated in real time to yield precise, repeatable anatomy.   
   >   
   >---   
   >   
   >## 4. Differentiation and organ formation: organogenesis   
   >   
   >Cells now differentiate into hundreds of specialised types and assemble    
   >into organs. Neural cells wire themselves into circuits. Blood vessels    
   >branch through tissues. The heart begins beating while still forming.   
   >   
   >Cell numbers increase exponentially, eventually reaching *tens of    
   >trillions*, yet:   
   >   
   >* proportions are maintained,   
   >* left–right symmetry is mostly preserved,   
   >* errors are detected and corrected.   
   >   
   >*What is striking:*   
   >No cell “knows” the whole plan, yet the whole plan reliably appears.   
   >   
   >*What we do not fully understand:*   
   >   
   >* How large-scale structures (like vascular trees or neural    
   >connectivity) are specified without explicit blueprints   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca