From: martinharran@gmail.com   
      
   On Mon, 19 Jan 2026 16:53:52 -0600, DB Cates    
   wrote:   
      
   >On 2026-01-19 10:28 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:   
      
   [...]   
      
   >>> I quite agree, but I thought this discussion was about examples of   
   >>> science confirming an earlier scientifically disputed Biblical statement.   
   >>   
   >> Which was nothing to do with the meaning of 'true', human; as stated   
   >> above, my only point was that it confirmed descent from a single   
   >> couple, the possibility of which scientific people seemed to treat   
   >> with derision, at least here.   
   >>   
   >I think this dispute is mostly due to a misunderstanding. I believe the   
   >derision was for a *unique* common ancestor not for common ancestry per se.   
      
   Fair enough. It has been an interesting discussion all the same.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)