Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,579 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 142,261 of 142,579    |
|    Mark Isaak to MarkE    |
|    Re: Chimp to human evolution - Sandwalk     |
|    24 Jan 26 15:00:00    |
      From: specimenNOSPAM@curioustaxon.omy.net              On 1/22/26 1:42 PM, MarkE wrote:       > On 23/01/2026 5:21 am, Mark Isaak wrote:       >> [...]       >> You don't seem to grasp that complexity can emerge from the       >> environment, if you make the conditions to allow it to. You would, I       >> think, describe human language as having high functional complexity.       >> Yet all you need to do to go from a language with a finite and small       >> number of short declarations to a language which allows an infinite       >> number of possible sentences that can express endless ideas is to       >> allow recursive grammar. That's one change. Not a trivial one by any       >> means, but not a show- stopper either.       >>       >> Higher intelligence is probably even simpler. All you need is a bigger       >> brain (and women's hips to accommodate it). That could happen with a       >> tiny change to one regulator gene. And once you have the larger brain,       >> that also allows more proficient tool use, which then allows writing,       >> which then allows libraries, which then allows civilization.       >>       >> Do you accept that going from Cro-Magnon to walking on the Moon       >> requires no new mutations at all?       >>       >       > In terms of overall mental capability, the chimp to human increase might       > be likened to say word processors*, n generations apart (where n > 1).       > As a programmer, you know that this requires megabytes of new specific       > information. Why do you imagine that mere bits would suffice for the       > chimp to human scenario?       >       > * Acknowledging that computer software and biological systems are       > different in many ways, but nonetheless subject to the same constraints       > in relation to functional complexity.              I reject your analogy utterly. In terms of overall mental ability, the       chimp to human increase might better be likened to RAM memory, n       generations apart. All that requires is more of the same, plus some       engineering advances in miniaturization. That's still a poor analogy,       because neurological processes are not as simple as arrays of flippable       bits, but the point remains: Nearly all that is required is more of the       same neurological processes.              --       Mark Isaak       "Wisdom begins when you discover the difference between 'That       doesn't make sense' and 'I don't understand.'" - Mary Doria Russell              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca