From: cates_db@hotmail.com   
      
   On 2026-01-31 11:30 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:   
   > On Thu, 29 Jan 2026 09:43:49 -0800, Mark Isaak   
   >  wrote:   
      
   [snip]   
      
   > I don't think that the Church's opinion that the recognition of God   
   > started with one couple is of any great significance and certainly   
   > doesn't harm anyone. I doubt that anybody other than theologians with   
   > nothing better to do ever even gives it any thought other than   
   > theologians with nothing better to do. I'm a very active participant   
   > in my Church and I've never ever heard anyone mention it, the only   
   > place I have ever encountered it is here in TO and in the recent book   
   > I read that started this sub-thread. Even in that book it was a minor   
   > item,   
   >   
   Do you still think this constitutes an (even if not notable) example of   
   science confirming a biblical position while discomfirming a previous   
   scientific position?   
      
   --   
   --   
   Don Cates ("he's a cunning rascal" PN)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)