From: martinharran@gmail.com   
      
   On Sat, 31 Jan 2026 13:36:52 -0600, DB Cates    
   wrote:   
      
   >On 2026-01-31 11:30 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:   
   >> On Thu, 29 Jan 2026 09:43:49 -0800, Mark Isaak   
   >>  wrote:   
   >   
   >[snip]   
   >   
   >> I don't think that the Church's opinion that the recognition of God   
   >> started with one couple is of any great significance and certainly   
   >> doesn't harm anyone. I doubt that anybody other than theologians with   
   >> nothing better to do ever even gives it any thought other than   
   >> theologians with nothing better to do. I'm a very active participant   
   >> in my Church and I've never ever heard anyone mention it, the only   
   >> place I have ever encountered it is here in TO and in the recent book   
   >> I read that started this sub-thread. Even in that book it was a minor   
   >> item,   
   >>   
   >Do you still think this constitutes an (even if not notable) example of   
   >science confirming a biblical position while discomfirming a previous   
   >scientific position?   
      
      
   Where did I say it disconfirmed a previous scientific position?   
      
   >--   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)