From: martinharran@gmail.com   
      
   On Sat, 31 Jan 2026 16:15:19 -0600, sticks    
   wrote:   
      
   [...]   
      
   >I believe Martin didn't like the fine-tuning section, which I thought   
   >was excellently done, and the OoL section lays out what we know with the   
   >impossible chances of it happening in a very easily readable manner.   
   >Again, they use the words of mostly secular scientists to further make   
   >their point.  It is very effective.   
      
   Please explain to me why you think all that fine tuning had to be   
   predetermined so that a particular kind of life could develop rather   
   than that a form developing to match the conditions that existed?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)