From: martinharran@gmail.com   
      
   On Mon, 2 Feb 2026 16:59:19 -0600, sticks    
   wrote:   
      
   >On 2/2/2026 6:11 AM, Martin Harran wrote:   
   >> On Sat, 31 Jan 2026 16:15:19 -0600, sticks    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >> [...]   
   >>   
   >>> I believe Martin didn't like the fine-tuning section, which I thought   
   >>> was excellently done, and the OoL section lays out what we know with the   
   >>> impossible chances of it happening in a very easily readable manner.   
   >>> Again, they use the words of mostly secular scientists to further make   
   >>> their point.  It is very effective.   
   >>   
   >> Please explain to me why you think all that fine tuning had to be   
   >> predetermined so that a particular kind of life could develop rather   
   >> than that a form developing to match the conditions that existed?   
   >   
   >You have been complaining lately that people are either misquoting you   
   >or accusing them of simply misstating what you believe.  I am puzzled   
   >then that you have no problem doing exactly that to me.  Please don't.   
      
   When someone misrepresents me, I clarify what I wrote or thought to   
   show how they are wrong. Can you please do the same here as I wouldn't   
   want to misrepresent anyone?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)