home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.origins      Evolution versus creationism (sometimes      142,579 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 142,475 of 142,579   
   Martin Harran to john.harshman@gmail.com   
   Re: Chimp to human evolution - Sandwalk    
   14 Feb 26 14:06:18   
   
   From: martinharran@gmail.com   
      
   On Tue, 10 Feb 2026 06:39:14 -0800, John Harshman   
    wrote:   
      
   >On 2/8/26 8:51 AM, Martin Harran wrote:   
      
   [...]   
      
   >I can't find that list. What I can find is this:   
      
   You seem to be having memory problems.   
      
   You replied to that post and asked for some examples. [1]   
      
   I replied to you, giving a list of about 10 examples  of the sort of   
   things I was referring to. [2]   
      
   You replied again and gave your opinion (mostly handwaving) about the   
   various examples [3]   
      
   In that post you made your stupid claim about me thinking MT-Eve and   
   Y-Adam were a couple. I may have been a bit harsh on you (no pun   
   intended) when I rebuked you for that. When you can't even remember   
   things you yourself posted earlier in this discussion, it's probably a   
   bit unfair to expect you to remember me explicitly correcting you at   
   least twice about that in previous discussions.   
      
   [1] Message-ID:    
   Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2026 10:17:00 -0800   
      
   [2] Message-ID: <8jhnlkhvb32c5uoc665iu2a0hrhjqslt3b@4ax.com>   
   Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2026 14:11:04 +0000   
      
   [3] Message-ID:    
   Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 06:53:35 -0800   
      
      
   >   
   >"I glad to see someone putting work into   
   >showing how religious belief in general and the Bible in particular   
   >had many explanation that science initially disputed but ended up   
   >having to agree with."   
   >   
   >And I swear that you have several times denied saying anything of the   
   >sort. Perhaps you think that they put work into it but failed to show   
   >such a thing? But why would you be glad?   
      
   I never said that science was *forced* to accept them which is what   
   you claimed I said. Memory issues again, apparently.   
      
   [...]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca