From: rokimoto557@gmail.com   
      
   On 2/16/2026 6:52 AM, Martin Harran wrote:   
   > On Sun, 15 Feb 2026 20:07:01 -0600, RonO    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> https://techxplore.com/news/2026-02-ai-psychosis-chatbots-sus   
   ain-delusions.html   
   >>   
   >> One of the dangers of AI use is that it can feed delusions.   
   >   
   > You really should keep that in mind when you try to use AI to support   
   > your claims about the Catholic Church.   
      
   You need to keep in mind that Google offers links to support their   
   summary, and it is what you come up with that always has fallen short   
   and added to your delusions.  You can check out the links to see if   
   Google is misinterpreting the situation.  I have found them to be in   
   error in the past, but not this case.  It is why you have always had to   
   run from reality.  You kept looking for junk to support your delusions   
   and got lied to about heliocentrism never being condemned and waffling   
   about the difference between formal heresy and heresy when all you need   
   to consider is that it was a heresy charge in both cases.  Wiki, the   
   geocentrists, and anti geocentrist Catholics claimed that it was a   
   formal heresy charge in 1616, but that it was only written up as   
   "heresy" the second time Galileo faced the charge.  The heresy was   
   clearly defined in both cases.  All the Church fathers adhered to   
   Biblical geocentrism.  Waffling about their writing about the universe   
   being geocentric was not teaching geocentrism does not mean that they   
   were not geocentrists.  Just like the authors of the Bible the church   
   fathers wrote about things as they understood them.  Just like the   
   authors of the Bible they were wrong about some things, and didn't have   
   the faintist notion about others.  What did the Pope claim about the Big   
   Bang and Bibilical writing?   
      
   Ron Okimoto   
   >   
   >> MarkE may   
   >> be slipping into this effect.   
   >>   
   >> My guess is that people need to be trained to get AI to give them   
   >> relevant information without falling into the trap of having AI tell you   
   >> what you want to believe.   
   >>   
   >> There ought to be ways to ask AI for information without triggering the   
   >> AI to second guess what you want as an answer.  We seemed to have   
   >> trained AI to tell us what we want to hear.   
   >>   
   >> Ron Okimoto   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)