From: martinharran@gmail.com   
      
   On Tue, 24 Feb 2026 09:22:19 -0600, RonO    
   wrote:   
      
   >On 2/23/2026 2:52 PM, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:   
   >> On Mon, 23 Feb 2026 10:07:00 -0600   
   >> RonO  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 2/23/2026 7:03 AM, Martin Harran wrote:   
   >>   
   >> [about the RC church' postion on geocentrisism in mediavel times]   
   >>   
   >> Church was wrong or right; I don't care.   
   >> It's not really about Origins is it? - and you both keep repeating   
   >> yourselves. Let it go.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   >This is the same type of Biblical denial that you repeatedly address   
   >with the Biblical creationists that are left posting.  There really   
   >isn't any difference.  Just think about it for a minute.  Harran doesn't   
   >want the Bible to have been wrong about anything.  He wants to make   
   >believe that it has always been faulty interpretation, but the   
   >interpretations have always been faulty because the Bible is just wrong   
   >about a lot of things.  MarkE is anti-evolution because he doesn't want   
   >the Bible to be wrong about nature.  Stick still wants to believe some   
   >of the young earth nonsense because he doesn't want the Bible to be   
   >wrong about those things.  Sticks has enough on the ball to understand   
   >that the earth and universe are a lot older than the Bible has been   
   >interpreted it to be, but he still wants the Bible to not be wrong about   
   >some of the young earth claims about the creation.   
   >   
   >Harran still wants the Bible to be correct about the creation, so he has   
   >to deny that it has always been shown to be wrong about what we could   
   >figure out for ourselves.  None of them can accept that the human   
   >authors of the Bible just did not fully understand what the creation   
   >actually was, and just like all the Church fathers they wrote about what   
   >they thought that they understood, but it was obviously wrong.  None of   
   >them can deal with the fact that there isn't a single god-did-it   
   >Biblical claim that has been verified by science or what passed as   
   >science in the past.  They understand that there has been 100% failure   
   >for their efforts because if they had any successes they would be   
   >crowing about those instead of wallowing in denial like Harran and the   
   >others.  The denial is all that they have left.   
      
   Ron, disagree with me if you like but please stop TELLING LIES about   
   me.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)