Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,602 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 142,585 of 142,602    |
|    MarkE to DB Cates    |
|    Re: Why evolution won't work (fitness la    |
|    26 Feb 26 22:04:56    |
   
   From: me22over7@gmail.com   
      
   On 26/02/2026 3:51 am, DB Cates wrote:   
   > On 2026-02-24 8:11 p.m., MarkE wrote:   
   >   
   > [big snip]   
   >   
   >>   
   >> I maintain that reality is either theism or not ("not" being   
   >> materialism, atheism, deism, pantheism etc). You seem to reject theism   
   >> as a *possibility* - why is that?   
   >>   
   > Okay, let me play.   
   >   
   > I maintain that reality is either naturalism (what you see is what you   
   > get materialism) or not ('not" being supernaturalism, theism being one   
   > of an infinite number of supernatural proposals)   
   >   
   > As a materialist I reject the supernatural as a legitimate explanation   
   > for reality. I admit that there is much of reality that we (currently)   
   > have not coherent explanation for and concede that there may be aspects   
   > of reality that we lack the intellectual capacity to ever understand,   
   > but supernatural explanations seem to be be mere personally generated   
   > placeholders for "I/we don't know".   
      
   I can understand that perspective, and appreciate that many thinking   
   people hold a view something like that. It has merit logically, in that   
   it doesn't preference a personal agent among possible supernatural   
   causes/explanations.   
      
   > Theism is one of many supernatural 'explanations'. Among theists there   
   > are a multitude of incompatible 'explanations'.   
   >   
   > I have found that most (all?) defenders of theism have one particular   
   > version of theism in mind and personally reject most other versions.   
   > IMHO this is intellectually dishonest.   
   >   
      
   These are valid concerns. Christianity, for example, faces the charge of   
   "the scandal of the particular" - Christ's incarnation as an embodied   
   human in a particular time and place. And as you note, why Christianity   
   over other religions? Good questions.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca