3914eda2   
   XPost: alt.prophecies.nostradamus, talk.politics.misc   
   From: cmdrlala@gmail.com   
      
   "M_P"  wrote in message   
   news:63349ea9-637c-48ba-85ae-05111d0361e1@c36g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...   
   On Mar 11, 2:11 pm, "Doc"  wrote:   
   > "M_P"  wrote in message   
   > news:4c0c54a7-1769-47a5-9602-6555b76bf8f1@j38g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...   
   > On Mar 10, 7:43 pm, "Doc"  wrote:   
   > > "Werewolfy"  wrote in message   
   > >news:2d79024b-960a-4f54-b0e8-fc7b9a3eb2bf@e2g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...   
   > > > On 10 Mar, 18:00, M_P  wrote:   
      
   > > >> Your ad hominems remain pathetic, but are no longer amusing. If you   
   > > >> post anything worth replying to, I'll let you know   
   >   
   > So, you won't add any more "substantive" debate   
      
   I can debate substantively only against something that has at least   
   the form of substance; ad hominems don't reach even that standard.   
      
   > until we again amuse you?   
      
   Maybe not even then: see above.   
      
   Then, if that were true, you'd best serve yourself and honor the   
   "substantiveness" of your debate topic by avoiding petty distractions or   
   detours. But, as I said early on, posters often have a personal axe to   
   grind, and the topic merely serves as a starting point to hone it. No one   
   now cares about the original topic, least of all, you, as the conversation   
   has now degenerated, by your choice, into a series of  barbs that have   
   nothing to do with the topic. The topic is now...your self-image and how it   
   measures up to others in your estimation.   
   Sorry, bub, but you're lost in the woods...perhaps, the woods were more   
   interesting, though, eh?   
   Doc   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)