Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics.drugs    |    The politics of drug issues    |    71,631 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 69,684 of 71,631    |
|    B Sellers to Scotius    |
|    Re: Jack Cafferty Finally Grasps "Drug W    |
|    04 Apr 09 10:12:00    |
      XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics       From: bliss@sfo.com              Scotius wrote:       > On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:31:12 GMT, bw@barrk.net (B1ackwater) wrote:       >       >> By Jack Cafferty       >> Special to CNN       >>       >> Editor's note: Jack Cafferty is the author of a new book, "Now or       >> Never: Getting Down to the Business of Saving Our American Dream." He       >> provides commentary on CNN's "The Situation Room" daily from 4 to 7       >> p.m. ET. You can also visit Jack's Cafferty File blog.       >>       >> Jack Cafferty says America's effort to prohibit illegal drugs doesn't       >> work and should be rethought.       >>       >> . . .       >>       >> NEW YORK (CNN) -- Here's something to think about:       >>       >> How many police officers and sheriff's deputies are involved in       >> investigating and solving crimes involving illegal drugs?       >       > So certain crimes should be legalized if there are a lot of       > that type going on?                Big snip                      Especially if they are crimes created by foolish legislators       to fulfill aims of bureaucratic law enforcement organizations by       turning commerce into criminal hands. The laws against certain drugs       were passed to improve society but have failed in that regard as we       have broken up families to save them from drug use. The turf wars with       many casualties to innocent bystanders as well as police and criminals       could not have happened without drug prohibitions.               Instead we have a bloated law enforcement agency that has       sponsored violations of the right to privacy and the right to       property. The expenses of this sort of moralistic battle are rather       high for the taxpayer as he/she must pay for capture, prosecution       and incarceration of people who have not for the most part harmed       anyone but themselves.                later        bliss              --        Do you support drug prohibition because it finances criminals       at home or because it finances terrorists abroad?        Question courtesy of: M. Simon September 21, 2001              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca