XPost: uk.legal, uk.politics.drugs   
   From: Huge@nowhere.much.invalid   
      
   On 2009-04-05, Svenne  wrote:   
   > On 5 Apr 2009 09:06:39 GMT, Huge  wrote:   
   >   
   >>On 2009-04-04, Svenne  wrote:   
   >>> On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 13:23:39 +0100, johannes   
   >>> wrote:   
   >   
   >>>>Politically, it's a question of what we want. I believe that the majority   
   >>>>are happy with the prohibition, to protect the more vulnerable and to   
   maintain   
   >>>>reasonable standards of trust and well being. I would not deal   
   professionally   
   >>>>with any person if I knew that he/she was a drug taker.   
   >   
   >>> What if the drugs the person took were alcohol and tobacco, would you   
   >>> refuse to deal professionally with them then?   
   >   
   >>Thank the Lhord that someone here has a brain, rather than merely shrieking   
   >>"Drugs bad! Drugs bad!" and running round waving their hands in the air.   
   >   
   > Prohibitionists are idiots and dickheads.   
   >   
   > This Johannes jerk posting here is a prime example. He's full of   
   > bluster, bigotry and bullshit, he hasn't a clue of what he's talking   
   > about and the fuckwit is probably a drug taker himself but is too dumb   
   > to grasp the fact.   
   >   
   > And it's lamebrains like him who are running the show. No wonder the   
   > world is in the sorry state that it is.   
      
   Hear, hear. Well said, Sir.   
      
      
   --   
   "The study of theology... is the study of nothing; it is founded on nothing; it   
   rests on no principles; it proceeds by no authority; it has no data; it can   
   demonstrate nothing; and it admits of no conclusion."   
               [email me at huge {at} huge (dot) org  uk]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)