XPost: uk.legal, uk.politics.drugs   
   From: bliss@sfo.com   
      
   johannes wrote:   
   >   
   > Huge wrote:   
   >> On 2009-04-05, Svenne  wrote:   
   >>> On 5 Apr 2009 09:06:39 GMT, Huge  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 2009-04-04, Svenne  wrote:   
   >>>>> On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 13:23:39 +0100, johannes   
   >>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>> Politically, it's a question of what we want. I believe that the   
   majority   
   >>>>>> are happy with the prohibition, to protect the more vulnerable and to   
   maintain   
   >>>>>> reasonable standards of trust and well being. I would not deal   
   professionally   
   >>>>>> with any person if I knew that he/she was a drug taker.   
   >>>>> What if the drugs the person took were alcohol and tobacco, would you   
   >>>>> refuse to deal professionally with them then?   
   >>>> Thank the Lhord that someone here has a brain, rather than merely   
   shrieking   
   >>>> "Drugs bad! Drugs bad!" and running round waving their hands in the air.   
   >>> Prohibitionists are idiots and dickheads.   
   >>>   
   >>> This Johannes jerk posting here is a prime example. He's full of   
   >>> bluster, bigotry and bullshit, he hasn't a clue of what he's talking   
   >>> about and the fuckwit is probably a drug taker himself but is too dumb   
   >>> to grasp the fact.   
   >>>   
   >>> And it's lamebrains like him who are running the show. No wonder the   
   >>> world is in the sorry state that it is.   
   >> Hear, hear. Well said, Sir.   
   >   
   > But the majority are unconvinced. You haven't managed to convince the World   
   > because your arguments are unconvincing. The World is happy having   
   prohibition.   
      
   	Thw people who get paid by the WOD are happy; the people who are   
   forced to pay for it are not and more wise up every day.   
      
   	Sooner or later prohibition will be abandoned.   
      
   	later   
   	bliss   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)