home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.politics.drugs      The politics of drug issues      71,631 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 69,700 of 71,631   
   Pete nospam Zakel to johannes   
   Re: U.N. war on drugs seen failing to cu   
   06 Apr 09 11:45:18   
   
   XPost: uk.legal, uk.politics.drugs   
   From: pxhxz@cadence.com   
      
   In article <49D759F3.5C121E2@size436464778fitter.com> johannes <   
   ohs@size436464778fitter.com> writes:   
   >Huge wrote:   
   >> On 2009-04-04, johannes  wrote:   
   >> > Huge wrote:   
   >> >> On 2009-04-04, johannes  wrote:   
      
   >> >> >I would not deal professionally   
   >> >> > with any person if I knew that he/she was a drug taker.   
      
   >> >> Then you're an idiot. But you're a prohibitionist, so we already knew   
   that.   
      
   >> > Amazingly single minded conclusion. Are you a drug taker by any chance?   
      
   >> QED. And an 'ad hominem', to boot. I would stop digging, if I were you.   
      
   >But you can't stop me. I can chose who I want to work with.   
      
   But how do you know if the person is a "drug taker"?  If the drugs the person   
   uses are illegal, they aren't going to confess to it.   
      
   Do you also discriminate against those who use legal drugs like alcohol,   
   tobacco, caffeine, aspirin, ibuprofin, etc.?   
      
   -Pete Zakel   
    (phz@seeheader.nospam)   
      
   "It is the business of the future to be dangerous."   
      
   				-Hawkwind   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca