f99a2012   
   XPost: alt.politics, alt.politics.usa   
   From: bliss@sfo.com   
      
   elizabeth wrote:   
   > On May 30, 8:10 am, B Sellers  wrote:   
   >> JohnR wrote:   
   >>> "elizabeth"  wrote in message   
   >>> news:380031e4-5ee2-4304-a55f-41948b026d08@s21g2000vbb.googlegroups.com....   
   >>> On May 28, 3:48 pm, px...@cadence.com (Pete nospam Zakel) wrote:   
   >>>> In article   
   >>>> <5c171e9a-86bd-4bac-8c66-7b3d97bda...@w40g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>   
   >>>> elizabeth  writes:   
   >>>>> I would legalize growing and consuming, but not buying or selling.   
   >>>> If you do not legalize buying and selling you will still have a black   
   >>>> market.   
   >>>> -Pete Zakel   
   >>>> (p...@seeheader.nospam)   
   >>> WRong.  It's not the "black market" that is the problem, it's   
   >>> organized crime that is the problem with pot in California.  They   
   >>> control the market, and do a lot of damage.  They don't want anyone to   
   >>> grow pot, because if supply is increased, their profit drops.   
   >>> ---------   
   >>> Organised crime can only operate effectively and efficiently in a black   
   >>> market. The contradictions in your statement are stark staringly obvious.   
   >   
   > )O(cackle~cackle)O(   
   >>         Elizabeth is an idealist and anything that tells her that the   
   >> idealistic plans she floats are full of holes is always ignored afaik,   
   >   
   > But . . but . . the thing is, I AM GROWING MY OWN AND SHARING IT, AND   
   > YOU'RE NOT.   
   > So just what holes in my plan are you yapping about?   
   >   
   >>         later   
   >>         bliss   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   	I am so glad it works for you and your friends.   
   	later   
   	bliss   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)