Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics.drugs    |    The politics of drug issues    |    71,631 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 70,220 of 71,631    |
|    John Watson to All    |
|    Pupil tests on drivers called into quest    |
|    05 Sep 09 11:53:47    |
      XPost: uk.legal, uk.politics.drugs       From: drjohn@NOSPAM.hotpotmail.com              Pupil tests on drivers called into question              A multimillion pound Department for Transport (DfT) campaign to show how       pupil size can reveal drug use in drivers has been launched despite a DfT       report recommending that pupillary tests by police be discontinued.              The 2004 Road Safety Research Report to monitor the effectiveness of UK       Field Impairment Tests (FIT) said that examination using a pupillometer       'contributed very little' to FIT and overall accuracy was low.              Drugs such as opiates are known to cause pupil constriction whereas       cannabis, hallucinogens and stimulants are known to cause pupil dilation.       Despite its own report's recommendation to discontinue pupillary tests,       the DfT believes its £2.3m campaign (News 21.08.09) will be effective.       'The pupil testis used along with a range of other measures precisely       because pupil dilation can be caused by a number of things. However,       although drugs are not the only factors to have an involuntary effect on       the eyes they are one of the signs that the police can look for,' said a       spokesperson. 'The reason that we use this as the focus for the campaign       is that this effect on the eyes is well known among drug users but they       don't think that enforcement authorities know about it. Our research       showed that the target audience was very responsive to this message.'              Optician's clinical editor, Bill Harvey commented: 'A campaign to       highlight the dangers of drug taking while driving is commendable, but the       potential use of pupil diameter as evidence in prosecutions is fraught       with potential injustice. The erroneous suggestion that dilation is a       useful predictor of underlying illegal drug use has been shown to be       inaccurate.'              http://www.opticianonline.net/Articles/2009/09/04/24021/Pupil+te       ts+on+drivers+called+into+question.html              --       John Watson       London              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca