Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics.drugs    |    The politics of drug issues    |    71,631 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 70,221 of 71,631    |
|    Graham to All    |
|    Re: Pupil tests on drivers called into q    |
|    05 Sep 09 12:01:45    |
      XPost: uk.legal, uk.politics.drugs       From: me@privacy.net              > Pupil tests on drivers called into question       >       > A multimillion pound Department for Transport (DfT) campaign to show how       > pupil size can reveal drug use in drivers has been launched despite a DfT       > report recommending that pupillary tests by police be discontinued.       >       > The 2004 Road Safety Research Report to monitor the effectiveness of UK       > Field Impairment Tests (FIT) said that examination using a pupillometer       > 'contributed very little' to FIT and overall accuracy was low.       >       > Drugs such as opiates are known to cause pupil constriction whereas       > cannabis, hallucinogens and stimulants are known to cause pupil dilation.       > Despite its own report's recommendation to discontinue pupillary tests,       > the DfT believes its £2.3m campaign (News 21.08.09) will be effective.       > 'The pupil testis used along with a range of other measures precisely       > because pupil dilation can be caused by a number of things. However,       > although drugs are not the only factors to have an involuntary effect on       > the eyes they are one of the signs that the police can look for,' said a       > spokesperson. 'The reason that we use this as the focus for the campaign       > is that this effect on the eyes is well known among drug users but they       > don't think that enforcement authorities know about it. Our research       > showed that the target audience was very responsive to this message.'       >       > Optician's clinical editor, Bill Harvey commented: 'A campaign to       > highlight the dangers of drug taking while driving is commendable, but the       > potential use of pupil diameter as evidence in prosecutions is fraught       > with potential injustice. The erroneous suggestion that dilation is a       > useful predictor of underlying illegal drug use has been shown to be       > inaccurate.'       >       > http://www.opticianonline.net/Articles/2009/09/04/24021/Pupil+       ests+on+drivers+called+into+question.html              Don't be silly, everyone knows that the Police can tell if your       guilty or not by your skin pigmentation.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca