Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics.drugs    |    The politics of drug issues    |    71,631 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 70,619 of 71,631    |
|    Bobbie Sellers to Brother Nate    |
|    Re: Drug War Chronicle, Issue #670    |
|    11 Feb 11 08:26:54    |
      4468542a       From: bliss@sfo.com              On 02/11/2011 07:49 AM, Brother Nate wrote:       > Bobbie Sellers wrote:       >> Governments have a lot in common, being filled with people who       >> believe that they know better than anyone else. Of course alcohol is       >> god given and euphoric not a nasty drug,       >>       >> People have such delusions,       >       > Yes, the US government has had a hypocritical position       > with respect to alcohol, but it's an example that reinforces       > why the people in charge should be hesitant to open the       > flood gates by legalizing all other drugs.               Based on their judgement over many long years       about alcohol and tobacco the Government should jus       butt out of their well-meaning but disasterous attempt       to control drugs and let societal evolution deal with       the problems.       >       > When you look at a downward-spiraling alcoholic it's hard       > to make a convincing case that they're acting in their own       > best interest. People in the grips of addictions often make       > really bad choices, and ones that don't take into account       > the harm they might be doing to people around them.       >       > As we've seen in the images coming out of Egypt, it's a       > very damaging thing to a society when its people feel like       > they can't report something to police without triggering a       > cascade of oppression, and that's a lesson we should       > take to heart ourselves. There are probably thousands       > of moms and spouses and caring friends in America       > who would reach out to authorities if they believed it       > would result in their loved one getting help, and it's a       > tragedy that so many people in that situation are forced       > instead into the conclusion that their only hope for a       > peaceful helpful outcome is to keep government in       > the dark.       >       > But of course there's always a flip side - government       > isn't the only source of hypocrisy. I wish I had a dollar       > for every time a person has pointed out that under-aged       > drinking and cigarette smoking are bad, and then turned       > around and said words to the effect that they'd much       > rather that their kids smoked pot instead. Personally if       > it was me I'd rather they just didn't smoke anything -       > while it might be true that pot smoking isn't nearly as       > damaging as decades of government policy have tried       > to portray it, it's still a bad habit.       >       > --       > Brother Nate       > bronate@gmail.com       > Moral Compass                      Not if you are using it medicinally. Besides       that aside from smoking it you could if it was legal       have it in various drinks such a bhang lassie which       is a cheap hemp leaf drink, or eat it in jam-like       preparations or baked goods. Right now only poor       people smoke it recreationally and people with enough       cash can spend various amounts of money on vaporizers.               A friend of mine says that the only       vaporizers he found useful have digital temperature       readouts and cost more than $500 USD.               later        bliss         Immoral Compass - Moderation in all things.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca