50116593   
   XPost: uk.politics.misc, uk.legal, alt.psychology   
   XPost: alt.politics.liberalism   
   From: andrewrichardwainwright@hotmail.co.uk   
      
   On 09/04/2013 10:04, Mel Rowing wrote:   
   > On 8 Apr, 13:20, Andy Wainwright   
   >  wrote:   
   >> On 08/04/2013 12:27, Mel Rowing wrote:   
   >   
   >>   
   >> He is a physicist. I am a philosopher. Our contributions to our   
   >> respective sciences over the same period of time are roughly equal.   
   >   
   > Oh my God spare me! Something else he is not!   
   >   
   > You have no academic endorsement or recognition in this field   
   > whatsoever. It's more fantasy. What have you published?   
      
   Nor have you otherwise you would recognise who I am.   
      
   The work I have been involved in is principally the theory behind   
   competition. Research which will prove very valuable to correctly   
   understanding "classical" economic theories, by putting such in the   
   proper context and thus elimnating many of the flaws in such models.   
      
   The Aristotles and Platos didn't have the luxury of virtual reality to   
   test situations and theories. I do.   
      
   I know what I've done, including publication in journals of real   
   importance, I don't need to blow any trumpet, nor do I wish to.   
      
   "Don't criticise what your you can't understand   
   Your sons and your daughters are beyopnd your command"   
   - Bob Dylan   
      
   >   
   >> See, it takes hard graft of letter writing and so forth to get the   
   >> message across. And the message is that many people are seriously   
   >> discriminated against in the typical work environment, which leads to   
   >> more sickies and more tax for those still with jobs.   
   >   
   > Most people have jobs there are ~2.6m out of a potential workforce of   
   > ~30m  who claim to be involuntarily unemployed. Still there are jobs   
   > advertised all over the place. More myth! More fantasy!   
      
   You're missing the point about potential capability and actual usage in   
   a commercial situation. A protoype computer product, hardware or   
   software has a very limited commercial potential, it's the same with a mind.   
      
   Only when a new system is tried and tested is it able to offer some use   
   to business. An alpha release software package that crashes regularly is   
   almost of no use in the commerical world.   
      
      
      
      
   >   
   >>> If you get drunk you are a nuisance and danger to others. If you get   
   >>> stoned the same applies. If through your weaknesses you become   
   >>> incapacitated and or non functional you will expect others to help you   
   >>> through it and yet more others to pick up the bill.   
   >>> It's because these others are functional that they are in a position   
   >>> to pick up that bill.   
   >>   
   >> Drunks and druggies can at least sober up. The jealous and naturally   
   >> paranoid can't so easily.   
   >   
   > Yes but only until the next time when the cycle will recommence. For   
   > abstainers there is no next time.   
   >   
   > Jealously is easily overcome through introspection and fear is   
   > overcome all the time by the brave and adventurous which includes all   
   > of us on some occasion or other.   
   >   
   >   
      
   Yet you still suffer from it.   
      
   I mean, what I cost you is a fraction of what you spend on petrol- yet   
   your're seemingly happy not to complain about brutally repressive Gulf   
   state despots getting a real slice of your money. I mean, what did the   
   King of Saudi Arabia do to get all that oil- bugger all really, yet   
   you've a problem with poor people supposedly doing nothing but none with   
   the rich. Easy to side with the wealthy and powerful- no courage at all   
   in that.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)