8c93ffe1
XPost: uk.politics.misc, uk.legal, alt.psychology
XPost: alt.politics.liberalism
From: john.jsm@gmail.com
On Apr 9, 2:41 pm, GB wrote:
> On 09/04/2013 14:27, saracene wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 9, 2:23 pm, saracene wrote:
> >> On Apr 9, 1:34 pm, GB wrote:
>
> >>> On 08/04/2013 13:31, saracene wrote:
>
> >>>> On Apr 8, 12:27 pm, Mel Rowing wrote:
>
> >>>>> If you get drunk you are a nuisance and danger to others. If you get
> >>>>> stoned the same applies. If through your weaknesses you become
> >>>>> incapacitated and or non functional you will expect others to help you
> >>>>> through it and yet more others to pick up the bill.
> >>>>> It's because these others are functional that they are in a position
> >>>>> to pick up that bill.
>
> >>>> So fuck freedom in other words. Why don't you come out as the Nazi
> >>>> you are?
>
> >>> That's appallingly stupid and narrow-minded. Even you, though, ought to
> >>> understand that your freedom to do something may impinge on someone
> >>> else's freedom in some way. There needs to be some give and take.
>
> >>> Your insistence that you can do whatever you like, regardless of the
> >>> consequences for others, is very akin to the Nazis' philosophy of taking
> >>> whatever they wanted.
>
> >> You another despicable prohibitionist cunt?
>
> > Sorry I feel about you people like Jews feel about Nazis.
>
> As it happens, I am not a prohibitionist. That's because I recognise
> idiocy when I see it. Likewise, I recognise the idiocy of you suggesting
> that you ought to be able to do whatever you want.
I didn't say that I should be. I should be able to smoke cannabis
though. It's basic, like freedom of thought/
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
