8c93ffe1   
   XPost: uk.politics.misc, uk.legal, alt.psychology   
   XPost: alt.politics.liberalism   
   From: NOTsomeone@microsoft.com   
      
   On 09/04/2013 14:49, saracene wrote:   
      
   >> As it happens, I am not a prohibitionist. That's because I recognise   
   >> idiocy when I see it. Likewise, I recognise the idiocy of you suggesting   
   >> that you ought to be able to do whatever you want.   
   >   
   > I didn't say that I should be. I should be able to smoke cannabis   
   > though. It's basic, like freedom of thought/   
      
   Look, I'm just working myself up into a decent rant here, and now you   
   are upsetting the apple cart by pointing out that we agree. :)   
      
   Actually, you and the government are in total agreement up to a point.   
   You agree that there ought to be limits on your freedom. Those limits   
   ought to reflect potential harm, both to yourself and others. So, what   
   you actually disagree with the government about is the degree of harm   
   cannabis does.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)