XPost: alt.activism.drug-war, uk.politics.drugs, alt.drugs   
   XPost: rec.drugs.smart, rec.drugs.misc   
   From: bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com   
      
   On 09/10/2015 03:03 PM, America wrote:   
   > Americans are supposed to be free.   
   >   
   > Freedom is Happiness!   
   >   
   > Everyone in the world has a natural right to freedom!   
   >   
   > This is because logically, freedom is right!   
   >   
   > All people are born right! People are born not wrong, and people are   
   > born not dead!   
   >   
   > We, all people, are born alive and right, and everything we do is right,   
   > except when we commit action based upon contradiction.   
      
   	Life involves lots of contradictions and the final contradiction   
   is that life invariably leads to death   
   >   
   > And all laws in the United States, and in all countries across the   
   > world, that are in contradiction to our natural right to freedom, are   
   > wrong.   
   >   
   > Because, we are naturally right.   
   >   
   > All people in the world have a natural right to freedom.   
   >   
   > Freedom is happiness.   
      
   	Hardly but properly used it can result in happiness.   
   >   
   > Freedom is wealth.   
      
   	Inverting that statement might be more correct but still..   
   >   
   > Restrictions and prohibitions are poverty.   
      
   	Oh shall we legalize murder or permit poisonous material to be   
   included in drugs?  Or go back to the days without a Pure Food and Drug   
   act when milk was diluted with water and colored with chalk.   
      
   >   
   > Laws in contradiction to our righteous natural right to freedom are a   
   > crime like the Holocaust was a crime.   
      
   	More or less but simple murder rather than an attempt at genocide would   
   be a better comparison,   
      
   > Freedom is for everybody. Freedom is not just for the Americans, not   
   > just for the British, not just for the Russians, but for everybody on   
   > earth.   
      
   	It should be but is not yet available to everyone.   
   >   
   > We should not, and do not, tolerate or accept, insults to our self-esteem.   
      
   	Maybe your self-esteem needs some correction.  Is your hat not tight?   
      
   >   
   > Condemnation by doctrine is denigration of character that should not   
   > exist on the face of Planet Earth. We are not wrong!  We are right!   
      
   	Is ISIL correct, dynamiting monuments and murdering archaeologists?   
   	I think they are horribly and self-destructively wrong.  The   
   young men who are doing these things if allowed to live long enough will   
   come to hate what they have done,   Likely most will not live that   
   long as they are a war band in love with destruction and the destruction   
   of others is self-destruction.   
      
   >   
   > We are born right, and everything we do is right, except when we commit   
   > action based upon contradiction.   
      
   	We are born and we are infants unconcerned with right or wrong.   
   We require extensive education to understand what is right and proper to   
   our societies.   
      
   > Such action is wrong, because others exist and have a right to freedom   
   > too, and we must admit others exist, and all juries certainly admit this   
   > fact.  So admitting this fact, of others' existence and right to   
   > freedom, we cannot violate it, without making a contradiction. And   
   > someone making a contradiction cannot maintain anything.   
   >   
   > Thus, freedom does not include taking others' freedom.   
   >   
   > If we have done wrong we apologize and move on.   
   >   
   > Victims deserve recompenses.   
   >   
   > Even though we are free to do all things, and even though we are of   
   > right, at liberty to do all things, all things are not necessarily wise   
   > or helpful. For instance drinking 15 shots of vodka, or having   
   > unprotected sex with strangers, are not either helpful or wise things.   
   >   
   > But no one has a right to condemn us for doing such things. There is no   
   > wrong to activity that does not potentially victimize someone else.   
      
   	50 years ago I would have agreed with you, but the last 50 years   
   have shown me that no one has perfect foresight or comprehension of the   
   consequences whether rewards or losses for the activities of the moment.   
      
   > Thus those who take violent and therefore victimizing action against us   
   > for doing such activities that do not potentially victimize someone else   
   > are in the wrong.  Repeal such wrongful legislation now because we have   
   > a natural right to freedom.  Repeal such legislation that, it should be   
   > said, equally subjugates and disenfranchises law enforcement, judges,   
   > and public legislators as well as common citizens alike, and makes a   
   > mockery of criminal justice, human dignity, and human rights.   
      
   	Well that works for some matters but matters not a whit to others   
   because as i say above few can anticipate the consequences of either   
   their charity or their denial of charity.   
   	   
   	Just this week we heard news of the possible damage caused   
   to prisoners put into solitary confinement as Chelsea Manning was being   
   tossed into solitary for having a tube of expired toothpaste.   
      
   	She is being punished for being and for telling the truth about   
   the subversion of our Constitution.   
      
   	bliss   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)