Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics.drugs    |    The politics of drug issues    |    71,631 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 71,030 of 71,631    |
|    Voter to All    |
|    Banning Smoking In Public Does Not Solve    |
|    29 Jun 18 14:09:48    |
      XPost: alt.activism.drug-war, uk.politics.drugs, alt.drugs       XPost: rec.drugs.smart, rec.drugs.misc       From: Voter@Vote2016.com              There are over 400,000 deaths due to smoking per year. This is insane.        (Compare       this to less than 200 deaths per year to massacres.) Banning smoking in public       does not solve the problem, and violates my, and your, human, and civil rights.       You're not wrong to smoke a cigarette! Regulation of commerce is the solution.       Cigarettes should not be allowed to be sold in the checkout lanes, but ought       to be       sold out of sight, out of mind, and not as an impulse item. They should be in       separate unmarked stores, or through a separate door to the supermarket, or at       least in a special section that a shopper will not stumble across unless the       shopper is deliberately looking for them. Selling cigarettes as an impulse       item       in the checkout lane is a sin! Because it is totally unnecessary. It takes an       interest only in pure profit. Tobacco is not _FOR_ smoking. People are       evilly,       and erroneously, telling us, that tobacco _is_ for smoking! But it isn't       wrong to       smoke! Just obviously bad and unhealthy.              Put warning labels on cigarettes, advising shoppers of the following:       Poison. Not for recreational use. Not illegal to consume recreationally.              Cigarettes shouldn't be marketed for recreation, nor commercially promoted for       recreational purposes!              Cigarette advertisements should be limited to magazines like Cigar Aficionado,       and       regulated so that they make only true statements. Such as: "Lower Tar."              Before a commercial business engaged in profit through cigarette sale can sell       cigarettes to someone, that person ought to have to pass a test on the dangers       of       cigarette smoking, advising them how stupid they are. It's not a crime to       otherwise sell, just ticket the "business." Regulation of commerce is in the       Constitution! Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3. This should be a civil, and       not a       criminal matter. At worst, if the business doesn't stop, it should at most,       become like repossession of a car. Most businesses will stop.              Smoking cigarettes is as stupid as inhaling glue. At least glue has warning       labels, and is not commercially promoted as a recreation. My research suggests       that apparently less than 1,000 people die to huffing per year. About one       million       people huff the dozens of paints and glues and solvents that can be used for       this       purpose. They are not wrong! They may be risking damage to their hearts,       their       kidneys, and their brains, which is obviously bad and unhealthy. Over fifty       million people smoke cigarettes. Yes, that's right FIFTY MILLION. In       addition to       nearly 500,000 deaths, persistent cigarette smokers also risk serious damage to       their health. I think the juxtaposition of the numbers related to huffing and       cigarette smoking are stupefying, and speak for themselves. Review them again.              If people want to smoke cigarettes, that is their civil, human, and unalienable       right. But to allow the COMMERCIAL PROMOTION of this physically degenerative       and       destructive item, as a recreational activity, is shameful. Sort of like       marketing       soft drinks as athletic drinks; or alcohol, or tuna fish, as fit for pregnant       mothers. Tuna Fish! Which has so much mercury, you're advised not to eat over       half a can of it per week yourself! It's not negatively labeled either, and it       probably shouldn't even be sold as food! It certainly is unfit for pregnant       mothers. As is alcohol. And while people playing "Over The Line Baseball"       may do       so and get drunk, and while people going bowling do the same, commercially       marketing alcohol for these purposes is deplorable! Why market alcohol,       cigarettes, marijuana, or any of the other drugs, you have a human right to       use,       as recreation?! Yes this is my point, moving towards the legalization of all       drugs, in a sane manner. And if anyone has any good, intelligent, or ingenious       ideas, we need them!              "The Congress shall have the power to... regulate commerce with foreign       nations,       and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes."       - U.S. Constitution, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3:              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca