XPost: ca.general, ca.politics, alt.california   
   XPost: alt.abortion, alt.drugs.abuse   
   From: GunsRGood@freedomrights.com   
      
   I don't believe in the so-called "morality" of those who condemn drugs,   
   weapons,   
   willful sexuality, and tent and vehicle living, any more than I believe in the   
   morality of those who say Jews should die.   
      
   Albeit drugs and alcohol ought to be marketed only as the poison and medicine   
   they   
   are, and yet freely available to all ages with adequate protections, sold   
   out-of-sight, out-of-mind, meaning like in a separate room at the back of the   
   store, or even through a separate exterior doorway.  We don't want heroin bars   
   and   
   heroin candy bars.   
      
   A child's right to sexuality is as important as a child's right to Church.    
   Child   
   abuse is deplorable.  Sex does not harm minors, so-called minors do make   
   choices,   
   and are not mentally incompetent, yet toddlers are mentally incompetent, and   
   yet   
   no adult can act as a police officer, and have sex with any minor and say it's   
   not   
   rape, any more than any police officer can say: "step out of the car please,"   
   "suck my dick please," and say it's not rape.  Yet police officers have   
   girlfriends and boyfriends, and may have sex with them on duty.  Our children   
   and   
   our parents, and our siblings, all should be considered as our fraternal twins;   
   and no one should use violence against anyone or punish anyone without a court   
   of   
   law, and thereby the consent of the people.  These are my people you're   
   assailing,   
   whether 8 or 18.  I don't care if you think you are their parent, they have   
   rights.  And everyone should use two or three types of birth control,   
   concurrently, and abort unplanned pregnancies in the first trimester/14   
   weeks/three months, before there is a brain or ghost in the fetus.  Unplanned   
   childbirth is the scourge of nations.   
      
   A gun is no more wrong than a fork, and the only sound defense of a country is   
   a   
   militia freely armed and organized, if with government assistance.   
      
   Guns could be considered like burglary tools or bolt cutters, and never illegal   
   for those of a sound mind and of a sound moral conscience, but only illegal for   
   those intent on villainy or murder.   
      
   A livable van can be financed on a ten year loan at 1% per month,   
   $30,000-$50,000   
   for $300-$500 per month, plus registration, insurance, gasoline, and repairs.    
   A   
   king sized bed in the back, a kitchen/refrigerator, and bathroom, and place to   
   sit, a veritable small studio.  A tent is the most miserable of housing   
   solutions   
   possible, but actually housing with privacy.  A shelter is a row of beds for a   
   three nights maximum, worse than a tent.  I don't like having to see tents,   
   but if   
   that is the situation, it is not alright to evict, yet you have to holistically   
   bring up society with free education, a higher minimum wage of 65% per capita   
   GDP   
   of the lowest GDP of any jurisdiction identified,   
   Federal/State/County/City/PerhapsBurrow for all of NAFTA, Mexico most   
   importantly   
   next to the USA, and guaranteed jobs if possible at that wage, and market the   
   drugs and alcohol as poison and medicine out of sight out of mind, as I guess   
   50%   
   of homeless are abusers, the other 50% are not.   
      
   Incarceration is capital punishment, those incarcerated shall die young   
   statistically and actually, and is thus death by incarceration, and evicting   
   someone from a tent or vehicle is also capital, as stealing housing, stealing a   
   poor man's horse, or stealing somebody's life savings is capital, and not   
   merely   
   grand larceny.   
      
   As are the following crimes capital:   
   1. Murder   
   2. Mayhem   
   3. Capital Battery   
   4. Capital Kidnapping   
   5. Repeated abuse of someone - a dependent or other -  who can't quit   
   can become capital - though it wasn't necessarily intended to be.   
      
   6. Capital Larceny - though it should be insured, or you sue "we the people" -   
   - also not necessarily intended to be capital.   
      
   The next two also can't be:   
   7. Serial extortion of the same person - makes the extorter the tax authority,   
   and   
   can't be.  They have to rob a different bank every time.   
   8. Serial rapists are sickos - address by asking if they want to upset people,   
   and   
   by legalizing prostitutes, and how else, or else they're criminally insane, if   
   they want to hurt others because they've been hurt by others, they need to know   
   they're only hurting themselves more, and its wrong.  What else could rehab do.   
      
   The above crimes need to be addressed, everything else needs to be protected?   
   Though for grand (and petty) larceny I guess we ought to have insurance.   
      
   So it's stealing and killing in secret.  Hard to bill if someone steals in   
   secret,   
   but they barely catch the act today.  Robbery's sort of just a form of fraud if   
   the perpetrator doesn't hurt anybody.   
      
   The war on larceny is questionable.   
      
   Ebola and Leprosy are the likes of what we deal with, and murderers and capital   
   criminals make us desperate men.  If somebody killed your spouse and child and   
   cut   
   off your hand, and wasn't sorry, would you just blow them away or want to?    
   And if   
   they were sorry would it make any difference?  And if you were driving along a   
   windy dark road, and hit an icy patch and went off the road and your spouse and   
   child died, and you lost your hand, and there was nobody to blame, and it was   
   nobody's fault, how would that compare?   
      
   How much of it is the insult and qualification, the communication of the   
   analytical fallacy of a sicko?  How much of it could be what the victim   
   perceives   
   without communicating?  But apologies, even if coerced, ensure a victimizer's   
   lie   
   cannot persist.   
      
   While Property and Sex, the mountain between us, can equal motive; otherwise   
   somebody's sick - criminally insane, if not taking the law into their own   
   hands.   
      
   Insults escalate to vengeance, but while the Bible says "leave vengeance to   
   God,"   
   the U.S. says "leave vengeance to me," and how can we have the system at all   
   anyway.  Maybe only because victims sometimes don't defend themselves.  Which   
   was   
   the original reason for the police who today persecute.  But I don't really get   
   it.  So someone who is going to take vengeance upon the police, fears the   
   police,   
   but the police don't fear to take vengeance upon people who are not really   
   murderers yet, but easily could change?  So they don't fear you huh?  They   
   disregard you huh?  I don't really get it, but it goes on.  I know we all have   
   the   
   capacity for peace and violence, and that we're all meant to be a danger to   
   evil.   
   I don't really get it, but it goes on.  I very much do believe, in justice and   
   human rights, but I don't believe this government's so-called "criminal justice   
   system," is right by the law.   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)