Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics.drugs    |    The politics of drug issues    |    71,631 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 71,067 of 71,631    |
|    Regulation Of Commerce to All    |
|    Underemployment Masks True Unemployment    |
|    07 Dec 19 15:10:09    |
      XPost: ca.general, ca.politics, alt.california       XPost: alt.abortion, alt.drugs.abuse       From: RegulationReform@USA.com              People are not truly gainfully employed when making $.02 per hour. They are       more       likely doing worthless jobs and a fiscal stimulus is needed. To spend on       employment and thereby as well purchase infrastructure which provides industry       for       the people. We want to assess the wealth of the nation accurately, if this       includes addressing the personal spending at the top.              Just making the point, that if unemployment were to go up, that is not       necessarily       an argument against the minimum wage. But unemployment vs. inflation,       inflation       vs. the interest rate, and the interest rate vs. price/book values; the Philips       curve* should be accurately assessed, and not give a false representation of       the       economy based on a low minimum wage.              That is, if an increase in the minimum wage were to cause the Philips curve to       shift out, we would be at a higher unemployment rate for each level of       inflation.       In this case, we would want to increase inflation by lowering the interest       rate or       fiscally stimulating the economy, addressing the true state of the nation.              Not falsely pretending things are okay, because people were employed to do       non-productive jobs at low wages. Rather, investment in both capital and       labor -       education, and equity, needs to be increased.                     Without the American economy no one would be earning any living at all. Pro       Basketball players would not be earning $30 million per year playing       Basketball in       Chad. No, it is the capital that is responsible for any return on labor at       all,       for everyone. Nor is a passive income that is not saved for capital fair.        That       someone gets more money by the hour to spend, than you, because they are taller       and can win at Basketball. And is there no money for the retarded or the less       intelligent?              Granted, maybe some people have focused more by the hour, on their jobs than       others, so far, but that just means they've put in more time like someone who       has       more education - maybe only because they had that opportunity, thus the vast       disparities in pay are largely unfair certainly if education isn't free. And       even       if it is, that would mean that more time passing gets you more money. So work       experience, education and brand name, intelligence, body, talent, financial       assets       themselves, are assets, which earn a passive income, while people work the       same or       less hours than others. Why participate? Are you with slave labor? The       return       on a $1 billion dollars is $50 million per year without work. While we differ       in       assets, we're all equal in expenses, and cost and Spirit. Those who own       capital       are liable to exploit others - i.e. their workers, if they're able. You can't       start a business without financial equity.              Meanwhile the world withholds property from you at gunpoint. It's just like       being       robbed.              Do you think this argument has merit? Am I still missing any points?              What if you are actually teaching people to be more industrious, the above       argument says you are just paid the same to teach? Just trying to consider       this       and see what if anything else might be.              How is it our society expects our politicians and those who serve them to be       altruists, but doesn't expect the same of everyone else? How come our society       has       a psycho arguing that everyone isn't altruistic, while it doesn't pay our       politicians and those who serve them any incentive to work?                     *Philips Curve Explained:       https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/1364/economics/phillips-curve-explained/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca