XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sac.politics   
   XPost: alt.politics.trump   
   From: drooler@gmail.com   
      
   Obama’s activities come as close to a violation of the one-president-at-a-   
   time principle as we have seen in recent memory.   
      
   Former President Barack Obama’s Thursday talk to House Democrats is a   
   stunning break from the norm that erstwhile holders of the nation’s   
   highest office keep their domestic political activities to a minimum.   
   Obama is speaking to them as Democrats try to navigate the midterm   
   elections and revive a stalled legislative agenda — things the current   
   president would normally be expected to address.   
      
   It is hardly the first time Obama has broken this norm, however. Rather   
   than a one-time infraction that can be papered over, this latest display   
   could help cement a new status quo that encourages former presidents who   
   are constitutionally barred from holding office to overstep their   
   boundaries. And Obama’s willingness to rewrite the post-presidential game   
   comes at a particularly dangerous political moment, when American   
   traditions safeguarding the peaceful transition of power need to be   
   reinforced rather than eroded.   
      
   Last year, Obama was the “hype man” at a major United Nations climate   
   conference, joining and arguably upstaging President Joe Biden. In 2019,   
   Obama launched a major initiative to help Democrats with redistricting,   
   contending it would counteract Republican gerrymandering ahead of this   
   year’s midterm elections.   
      
   And Obama has rebuked former President Donald Trump after leaving office   
   so many times it’s hard to keep track. He said Trump’s use of a racially   
   charged term to describe the coronavirus “pisses me off.” He said Trump’s   
   travel ban on seven Muslim-majority countries, imposed after the   
   Republican had campaigned on a broader ban on Islamic immigration, was un-   
   American. Even before Trump took office, Obama claimed the right to speak   
   out against his successor when our “core values may be at stake.”   
      
   Obama did keep quiet for most of the Democratic presidential primaries   
   until his former vice president had clearly secured the nomination. But   
   then he took to the general election campaign trail and savaged Trump. He   
   hit Trump on racial issues, his climate policies, his pandemic response,   
   even his personal character.   
      
   That is private citizen Obama’s constitutional right, of course. And some   
   politicking on the campaign trail by previous presidents is expected. Past   
   ex-presidents have frequently spoken at party conventions (former   
   President Gerald Ford notably said at the 1996 GOP confab that then-   
   President Bill Clinton was “neither a Ford or a Lincoln” but a   
   “convertible Dodge”).   
      
   They are also known to write the occasional op-ed about current policy   
   debates, and former Presidents Richard Nixon and Jimmy Carter visited with   
   foreign leaders and advised the current occupants of the Oval Office.   
   Obama himself once ceded the presidential podium to Clinton, who gleefully   
   kept talking. President Ronald Reagan sent all the living ex-presidents to   
   represent him at slain Egyptian President Anwar Sadat’s funeral. Far more   
   often, though, they engage in nonpartisan activities, like raising money   
   for hurricane relief or helping Haiti.   
      
   But Obama has moved beyond the occasional, stray campaign appearances of   
   his predecessors or wonky policy weigh-ins to become a heavy political   
   operator in his retirement. Some view him as a kingmaker in the Democratic   
   Party, arguably more its leader than the less popular and ineffectual   
   Biden — which may be why he was called in Thursday and at other moments.   
      
   Indeed, allies describe the ex-president as having a “global following,”   
   as if that’s a justification for his post-presidential interventions.   
   “Poll after poll show young people in particular are despairing of whether   
   democracy can work, whether politicians are up to the task,” longtime   
   Democratic leader John Podesta told CNN when the former president   
   addressed the United Nations climate conference. “They see Obama as   
   inspirational and who tells it like it is.”   
      
   But providing a temporary boost to the Democratic Party can’t be more   
   important than the broader interests of democracy itself. Obama’s   
   activities come as close to a violation of the one-president-at-a-time   
   principle as we have seen in recent memory. (Reagan could have tried to   
   similarly overshadow his successor, President George H.W. Bush, and   
   subsequent Republican leaders with his party’s base, but age and   
   Alzheimer’s intervened.) Obama, meanwhile, is still only 60 years old,   
   much younger than Biden, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi or House Majority   
   Leader Steny Hoyer.   
      
   Of course, Obama’s activities aren’t taking place in a political vacuum.   
   His immediate successor is considering running again and has encouraged   
   some of his supporters to think he’s still the rightful president — robbed   
   of another four years through unproven voter fraud claims — or will even   
   be reinstated before the conclusion of Biden’s term. So the current   
   president is laboring in the shadow of two ex-presidents.   
      
   Bizarre conspiracy theories aside, Trump is a major driver of Obama’s   
   post-presidential political activities. The 45th president made rolling   
   back Obama’s legacy a big part of his own agenda, necessarily drawing the   
   former commander in chief back into the debate; The New York Times   
   described Trump as pulling Obama out of retirement.   
      
   Trump was the leading proponent of birtherism, the erroneous and racist   
   notion that Obama was ineligible for the presidency. And of course, Obama   
   shares the prevailing view among Democrats and never-Trump conservatives   
   that his successor is a uniquely malign force in American politics, a   
   position that has hardened following the Jan. 6 Capitol riot to disrupt   
   the vote count confirming Biden’s victory.   
      
   At the same time, Obama spent much of his two terms criticizing his   
   predecessor, President George W. Bush, to a greater degree than was normal   
   at the time — even though it was more difficult to argue Bush posed an   
   existential challenge to democracy and though he himself leveled no   
   blistering personal attacks on Obama. (Bush, for his part, had no problem   
   gracefully accepting that his time in office had passed and ignoring   
   Obama’s attacks rather than using them as justification to re-enter the   
   fray.)   
      
   It is almost as if Obama and Trump have emerged as dueling presidents-in-   
   exile to the detriment of the man now in office, and likely those who come   
   after them. Biden cannot escape Obama’s shadow or Trump’s wrath, with each   
   predecessor representing their slices of the electorate better than he   
   does.   
      
   It would be a supreme irony if the precedents Obama is setting create a   
   glide path for the man he so adamantly opposes — who, unlike Obama, is   
   actually constitutionally eligible for another term — to keep up his own   
   never-ending campaign.   
      
   https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/biden-overshadowed-obama-former-   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)