XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.politics.republicans, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: sac.politics   
   From: joelcrump@gmail.com   
      
   Bobbie Sellers  wrote:   
   >On 9/16/24 01:29, Progress wrote:   
   >   
   >> If they OD and kill themselves, there won't be a drug problem.   
   >>   
   >> We could solve this whole drug abuse issue in 72 hours and have plenty of   
   >> materials for biofuel or fertilizer.   
   >>   
   >> Let's get it done.   
   >   
   >	That is about the dumbest solution to a real problem that   
   >I have read. It goes right along with the Filipino dictator who   
   >had dealers shot on arrest and mere users jailed.   
   >	The assumption on your part is that the drugs of choice   
   >are deadly.  Most are not. The purvyers of illegal drugs have   
   >made them mode deadly by dilution with Fentanyl. If pharmeceutical   
   >companies were to supply the drugs they would provide measured   
   >doses which is how before the Harrison Narcotic Act of 1917   
   >people addicted dure to illness or war wounds were treated.   
   >Most of these folks worked for a living at a trade or profession.   
   >the HNA/1917 created the class of junkies.   
      
      
   The drugs I use aren't fatal in the doses I use them.  Maybe   
   "Progress" wants me to take twice as much (which I have) DXM or more,   
   but I like living.   
      
   --   
   Joel W. Crump   
      
   Amendment XIV   
   Section 1.   
      
   [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall   
   abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the   
   United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of   
   life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;   
   nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal   
   protection of the laws.   
      
   Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are   
   liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)