XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.politics.republicans, talk.politics.guns   
   From: joelcrump@gmail.com   
      
   "Scout"  wrote:   
   >"Joel"  wrote in message   
   >news:c4dmej14552795p71gkj15igigvc3sqokv@4ax.com...   
   >> Klaus  Schadenfreude    
   >> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>He's [a transgender woman] still a male, not a woman.   
   >>   
   >> That's transphobic ignorance.   
   >   
   >So according to you reality = transphobic ignorance?   
   >   
   >Then you wonder why we consider you delusional.   
   >   
   >The ONLY person here who can't accept him as he is seems to be..... Well..   
   >YOU!   
   >   
   >Hardly sounds like a good basis for a lasting relationship....   
      
      
   She is trans and I accept her as that, what is the problem with "basis   
   for relationship"?  You might not accept that she's trans, I do.   
   You're basically talking nonsense.   
      
   --   
   Joel W. Crump   
      
   Amendment XIV   
   Section 1.   
      
   [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall   
   abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the   
   United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of   
   life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;   
   nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal   
   protection of the laws.   
      
   Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are   
   liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)