XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.politics.republicans, talk.politics.guns   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   "Joel"  wrote in message   
   news:7ue1fjtcjafdqcm58f2g1vh80c6h4ggqvc@4ax.com...   
   > "Scout"  wrote:   
   >>"Joel"  wrote in message   
   >>news:c4dmej14552795p71gkj15igigvc3sqokv@4ax.com...   
   >>> Klaus  Schadenfreude    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>He's [a transgender woman] still a male, not a woman.   
   >>>   
   >>> That's transphobic ignorance.   
   >>   
   >>So according to you reality = transphobic ignorance?   
   >>   
   >>Then you wonder why we consider you delusional.   
   >>   
   >>The ONLY person here who can't accept him as he is seems to be..... Well..   
   >>YOU!   
   >>   
   >>Hardly sounds like a good basis for a lasting relationship....   
   >   
   >   
   > She is trans and I accept her as that,   
      
   No you don't, or you wouldn't talk about him in the feminine.   
      
   > what is the problem with "basis   
   > for relationship"?  You might not accept that she's trans, I do.   
      
   If you did you would have said "he's trans".   
      
   So clearly you do not accept him for what he is.   
      
   If she were actually a she.. then she's not trans.   
      
   To claim she's trans is to say she is pretending to be a man.   
      
   See what I mean, you claim to accept him, but you don't.  Otherwise you   
   wouldn't need to lie to us or yourself about what he is.   
      
      
      
      
   > You're basically talking nonsense.   
      
      
   You certainly are. What you say clearly indicates that you do NOT accept him   
   for what he is...otherwise you wouldn't have to lie about it.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)