Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics.drugs    |    The politics of drug issues    |    71,631 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 71,615 of 71,631    |
|    useapen to All    |
|    Hemp industry plans next move after Trum    |
|    17 Nov 25 09:09:15    |
      XPost: alt.hemp.politics, alt.politics.trump, sac.politics       XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns       From: yourdime@outlook.com              The hemp industry is regrouping and gearing up for a significant lobbying       blitz following passage of the government funding package that contained a       provision they say would outlaw nearly all hemp products.              The legislation clarifies the definition of hemp to ban all hemp-derived       products containing THC, which were legalized by the 2018 farm bill.              Legal hemp products are limited to a total of 0.4 milligrams per container       of total THC, or any other cannabinoids with similar effects. Cannabinoids       that are synthesized or manufactured outside the plant, such as delta-8       THC, are banned.              The Food and Drug Administration now has 90 days to publish a list of       natural and synthetic cannabinoids and provide a definition for       “container.”              According to the U.S. Hemp Roundtable, the vast majority of hemp products       on the marketplace surpass the 0.4 milligram threshold, even the       nonintoxicating ones.              In a memo released Thursday, the trade group said the hemp industry took a       serious blow, but they’re confident in finding a path forward because the       language in the funding bill gives a one-year period before the ban takes       effect.              “We’re disappointed, but not defeated,” the group said. “Our new mission,       friends: 365 days to regulate, NOT ban.”              The group pointed to a draft bill circulated over the summer from Rep.       Morgan Griffith (R-Va.) that would establish a detailed regulatory scheme       for hemp-derived products, including milligram thresholds, labeling       requirements, and a new chapter in the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act       explicitly giving the FDA authority over cannabinoid hemp products.              The 2018 farm bill removed hemp from the controlled substances list in a       bid to boost farmers’ income and expand production of the plant, which can       also be used in textiles and cosmetics. But stakeholders said lawmakers       didn’t anticipate the industry’s rapid growth.              Those cannabinoid products, including gummies and drinks, have exploded in       popularity and are now sold beyond dispensaries, expanding to gas       stations, convenience stores, and even major retailers such as Target.              Michelle Bodian, general counsel and head of regulatory affairs for the       THC beverage brand Nowadays, said there are more than 40 states that       regulate hemp-derived THC in a way that can be scaled to the federal       level.              “Our goal is to help federal policymakers create a clear, enforceable       framework that brings this fast-growing category into the mainstream while       eliminating room for bad actors,” Bodian said in a statement.              The farm bill required the FDA to establish a regulatory framework for       hemp products, but it never did, allowing intoxicating hemp products to be       introduced in the marketplace without oversight or standardization.              Griffith, the chair of the Energy and Commerce Health subcommittee, has       not yet formally introduced a bill, though he’s authored other hemp and       CBD legislation in the past.              “This is not one year to a ban. This is one year to regulate. And the       industry will do exactly that — united, determined, and unwilling to let       Washington destroy what farmers built and consumers want,” said Thomas       Winstanley, executive vice president and general manager of Edibles.com, a       new online hemp marketplace from the parent company of Edible       Arrangements.              A varied array of groups rallied in support of the legislation, including       alcohol groups, cannabis and cannabis-adjacent companies, as well as major       marijuana prohibition groups.              They lobbied hard for limits or bans on hemp-based THC and aren’t eager       for Congress to change it.              The American Trade Association for Cannabis and Hemp (ATACH) in a       statement said the funding bill provision made an important distinction       between intoxicating and nonintoxicating products and synthetic and       natural products.              “The intoxicating hemp marketplace is rife with bad actors peddling       synthetic drugs and cannabis under the guise of hemp, often without       sufficient age gating,” Chris Lindsey, the group’s vice president of       policy and state advocacy, said in a statement.              “Contrary to the rhetoric in some corners, intoxicating hemp products       would continue to be available for sale through state cannabis and hemp       programs,” Lindsey added.              Anthony Coniglio, CEO of NewLake Capital Partners, a cannabis real estate       company, said closing the hemp loophole “is progress,” but Congress needs       to take the next step and “turn to comprehensive federal cannabis reform”       for legalization and regulation.              https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/5605017-hemp-industry-regulations-       future/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca